any dancing at all. rachel: you are not exempt. griff: would your friends in the gym make fun of you if they knew you were jamming to wham? joe: no. number one i don t have friends in the gym. if you have friend in the gym, you are not getting the work done and number two, there is nothing too serious about it. you go to the gym have fun cut up. i would dance if i knew how. i envy people that can. go on tv and talk to 3 million people about my opinions i wouldn t sing or dance in front of five people without being super embarrassed. rachel: telling some of our friends in the commercial break is he a sol cycle ler. griff: you said you would come with me. rachel: i will some time this week peloton at home. sent me an email that said we haven t seen you lately. [laughter] rachel: that will tell you how my workouts are going. joe: clothes hanging on it? rachel: no, actually in a room just for it. it misses me and i told my peloton i will come back after the new
team, jimmy failla.al there itit is. journalist, gerri willis. and co-host of fox and friends weekend, will cain [music] and over here, red team ready to rumble. michael optus. i predict 100% sunshine. pre meteorologist janice dean. and you know her, love her,ne can t get enough b of her. fox news julie. janice, i was going to say, you were allowed to dress up, you didn t have to wear your regular clothes. watch out for the redress wave. yout see where this is going, debate has begun, you remember high school debate. well we ll do that,yo christmas style. let s get to it. our first debate jimmy versus michael.t hereth is your topic. we love christmas music. timeless classics. they transport you back in time. but here their is a limit, a when is it acceptable to start jingling those bells halloween or thanksgiving,hall michael, you are arguing foror t halloween, take the podium. you can do it. ladies and gentlemen, lovers of christmas in the world. i say to you, not o
where, in the bbc radio theatre in central london, we are going to bring together newscast, for, like, a massive, mammoth, it s going to be amazing and hopefully, you re going to be there! i did know about this, ijust didn t know when it was. i think it was probably in this thing somewhere, but it wasn t impressed upon my mind that it was the 18th of. was it the 18th?! 18th of.? this is good marketing, though, over and over again, which is what you re meant to do in an advert, which is good. alex, i don t know if you have the same issue as i ve had a few times and actually, she keeps reading it as catsfest . it does look like catsfest! is that like a really bad happening? interesting you went for the musical i went for the animal! i went for a giant, i mean, that could be a spin off pets podcast. what could you call it? catsfest? no, catscast! newscats! oh, no, we had anyway, the basic is on the 18th of october, of our social medias or go you will find the details and yo
semicooperative or cooperative fashion. i ll explain all that and where there s room for skepticism, but all this speaks to what is shaping up is one of the committee s most decisive legal victories as white house veteran and 2016 campaign chair steve bannon makes this move at an attempted partial legal surrender. he is offering a type of last-minute bid to try to cut a deal and cooperate with the january 6th committee. he is saying he wants to testify before this committee. he s sighing that now he will deal with them. he will talk, and if he did so under oath that s a new legal obligation, and he ll do so despite the defiance. a letter from trump himself attempts to explain the reversal. if nothing else, the pressure got to bannon. congress did not negotiate or weight on bannon. the committee made an assertive decision, unusual for democrat-run probes to immediately hold wanten in contempt when he defied, to immediately push for the doj to indict him, which it did. there
playing out before our eyes taking us to another scary place over the past fort night. a criminal investigation into donald trump s handling of classified information looming over the country and both major political parties with an even more significant specter casting a long, shadow in sharp relief. the very real possibility that a former president of the united states could soon be indicted for violating the espionage act or other federal statutes. it is extremely volatile and if donald trump is indeed indicted although that remains a big if, for the moment and we ll move beyond volatility and into more territory that s explosive into where there is a dramatic increase into more political violence than we ve seen already in our republic. in just the last two weeks we ve seen threats against the fbi and law enforcement surging. a pennsylvania man was arrested last week for threatening to kill agents of the federal bureau of investigation and a man armed with a semiautomat