supreme court was pretty clear it means this will not happen, at least not yet the supreme court issued wha is known as a stay, meanin they are effectively blockin that texas judges decision while this case is appeale through our court system maybe even all the way back to the supreme court down the roa now, the lower court battle is complicated and we the, and ma lead to some chaos down th line for mifepristone access and we are going to talk t experts about that in just a moment but for now, for tonight, this drug is still widely available so, on a practical level, that is where we are. the question is, on a lega level, tonight s ruling is als quite interesting. there s a majority of justices who approved tonight s stay. but at least two did not that s justice clarence thomas said that he would have denied this day he did not explain why it was just a single line in this ruling that says he disagrees. and justice samuel alito wrote a full dissent, we are going t ask our e
rather arrogant you will see this sometimes an high powered executives in such they really think that they ar able to talk their way out o anything and so that might be of why he feels he is good enough to get in there and talk withou having to fight legally, without having a certain - and perhaps he feels he can do his client a lot of good no doubt, he may feel that i in your sin to trump, being on afraid to go in there and pu on - for trump. but there is a reason wh impress relations people usually are not involved in th substance of policy making decisions or legal strateg decisions because they are really involved and they exten and are not involved in that substantive effort somebody like him seems to wan to do both and usually that s really ba idea let me ask you if i, ca shanlon wu, about anothe development. there s another trump matter obviously, there is this ongoing legal struggle here in manhattan. we learn tonight to th manhattan d.a. s offic withdrew its appeal of a