are thing going on. if the president and team were playing ball more with the mueller probe, things probably would be moving at a faster clip. but resistant at every term so that makes people dig in harder and makes you have these a lot of the in indictments about lying to federal law enforcement officials. i mean, when you start to do that, it metastasizes. and, again, they are playing for two audiences here not just mueller but for the public as well. but that complicates t ait. and you have to ask at what point are they trying to drag it out or wrap it up? and you hear the oligarch and roger stone, confusing, but the bottom line is the lawyers don t trust the president to go into meetings. got it. and up next, both good and difficult times for the country. the west won t contain communism, it will transcend communism. don t just get involved, fight for your seat at the table. better yet, fight for a seat at the head of the table.
military action that we did last year. we have a leader who was a war criminal supportive by the iranians and russians. that s a risky response. if the west won t stand up when a leader uses gas, multiple times against his own people, we live in a very dangerous world. tucker: sets the consensus. last time we asked the obvious questions. when we go to war, are we sure this is all real? we really know that assad was behind the gas attack? it s an obvious question. how can we know that conclusively so soon after the attack happened question mike we didn t have any americans on the ground and why would assad do that given the surety of his own interests? while on the subject, why is a war in syria a good idea for the united states in the first place? how does it make us safer, happier, more prosperous? these seem like reasonable questions. the exact questions you would want your policymakers to ask. they re not asking them. the first person we asked those questions to come out republi
we have a leader who is now a war criminal supported by the iranians and russians, that demands a strong and risky response. if the west won t stand up when a leader uses gas multiple times against his own people, we live in a very dangerous world. tucker: so that s the consensus. last night we asked the obvious questions about her. before we go to war, are we surr all of this is real? to be know that assad was behind the gas attacks? it s not an offense of assad but it s an obvious question. how can we know that conclusively so soon after it happened? we did not have americans on the ground. why would assad do that, given the certainty it would hurt his own interests? while we are on the subject, why is a war in syria a good idea for the united states in the first place? how would that make us safer, happier, more prosperous? those seem like reasonable questions, in fact, the exact questions you would want yourak policymakers to ask. they are not asking them. they are offended to
response. you know, if the west won t stand up when a leader uses gas, multiple times against his own people, we live in a very dangerous world. now, chris, what s important here is the war powers act is clear as can be. members of congress weasel out of their constitutional responsibility. you know why? because if i vote to approve an aggressive action against syria and it goes wrong and boy could it go wrong. we saw that in libya. we saw that in iraq, elsewhere. i am held accountable. that s why we get paid as members of congress. and a refusal to say yay or nay is a terrible able gags to our responsibility duty. life is choices. you guys are down there to naking. congressman, thank you for joining us. facebook ceo will testify on capitol hill in just hours as researches reveal what your facebook likes will reveal about
the argument they re making is iran is complying with the major components they say. they say iran has received tens of billions in unfrozen assets the u.s. and west won t be able to get back and they also have lots of businesses that are conducting business within iran and they don t want to see those businesses lose those relationships. but those who are opposed to that point of view say iran and its behavior has gotten much worse since the iran nuclear agreement and needs to be addressed through the nuclear agreement. bill: we ll find out real soon sandra: more with chris wallace. thanks for joining us this morning. good to be with you, sandra. congratulations, welcome to the show. sandra: thank you, sir. good to have you on. our first week. it s been a big week. here we are ending this week, chris, with wondering where the president is going to go next with this iran deal. he is up against a deadline. whether he stays in, stays out, at least for the time being the decision