although i can say that this may be due to some inertia. because it is coming. it s coming more and more quantities. but in order to defeat russia, we need a quicker response. pretty much as zelensky said, we need limitless supply of such weapons. just to be at par with russia. russia s economy is much larger. they were prepares for this war and stocking up equipment and being prepared for this. so in order to match it, we need to continue supply from our partners. martha: obviously the biggest problem is what is coming through the air from russian territory and now from the sea as well. obviously the no fly zone seems to be an idea that is not going to fly for lack of a better word. there s been this discussion
including keith kellogg and others we have spoken to, that he didn t articulate the support for ukraine to pull a victory out of this. they talk about what they re going to do to putin in terms of sanctions. he had that strange comment about responding in kind to a chemical weapons attack. they talked about you have to give this time and also the bizarre statement that sanctions were neverment to deter anybody because in the lead up to the invasion that s all anybody from the white house was saying, that they were meant to deter people. there s not a clear strategy to help ukraine win, which makes people wonder did president biden think that russia was going to roll over ukraine in a couple days and be dealing with a puppet government in kiev and how to deal with that? they never planned for the fact that this brave ukrainian resistance would rise up and come close to a stalemate if not maybe being on the way to driving the russian forces back.
changer. they have turned this whole situation around. the emergency session of nato should have been about that very fact, that we are here to win and we ve been talking about this for weeks on fox. this is the opportunity that zelensky has given nato. he can crush the russian army, period. what more deterrence could there possibly be than that in terms of russia attacking nato than having zelensky destroy most of his army. just looking at it in terms of our own self-interests, if they re not motivated enough in terms of ukraine s interest, that should have been focus one and we re going to pull out all the stops. stop the nonsense about migs. we re still dithering over the s-300s. it s been 15 days. we still tonight have them in
martha: president biden committing millions to ukraine. in moments, general jack keane and pete hegseth joins us with their reaction to what the president said. we ll go to mark meredith live first. u.s. officials say they re going to keep sending ukraine the military aid it needs even as the war is deadly as it is, complicates efforts to send in complies. this latest weapons shipment will reach ukraine. it includes anti-tank and anti-aircraft missile it s and the switchblade drones. they re portable, cost-effective and achieving their targets and body armor. russia has said they will attack
the sea of azov and the black sea. martha: what about how the russian military is performing and how much equipment has been destroyed and how much they have left. when you look at this, look at ukraine and there s a lot of talk about pushing beyond ukraine, but can ukraine win this battle? can they get their territory back based on how russia is performing? i would say that you should not write them off. we not we. i was with them. some didn t believe that they had a chance from the beginning and they would get overrun quickly, and they have demonstrated that they have the will and the capability to fight when they re far less well-equipped than their opponents. russia has taken a bloody nose big time in this fight so far. the numbers are not going to be right. but some say as many as 15,000, i ve heard closer to 13,000