collusion. there are all kinds of rumors around. there are newspaper stories. but that s not necessarily evidence. eboni: sounds like eric bolling right there, huh? eric: very left leaning democratic senator on the intel committee says we have no evidence of collusion. by the way, we have been saying this for the better part of three weeks into this show right now? every single day. they are worried about what donald trump says to sergei lavrov in the oval office about comey being a nut job or nut cake, whatever he said instead of worrying about where is the evidence? they leak everything donald trump does. they leak when he goes to the bathroom. how he orders a pepsi. the most important leak, if they had it, they don t have it otherwise they would leak the evidence of collusion. eboni: you know who we get to put the nice button on that, eric, real quick, they come out and say we have concluded this investigation and there is no evidence, you won t hear a peep from anybody. anybo
of hillary s emails and botched job i agree with you on that. competing is the white house wasn t on one page. eric: donald trump himself gave his own communications department gave himself an a. he gave them, i believe, a b or c, i can t recall. and he is right. the communications department on expires, i have known him a long time as well. they really needed to get that thing locked down. this is what we are going with. here s the story. we are putting it out so that there isn t any question as to what was the reason behind this. katherine: some of them were straight flips. written questions or the trump as the press conferences themselves. katherine: i think we would all love that amid this new round of leaks doubt is being cast on all this innuendo by unlikely source. california s democratic senator dianne feinstein. so far you have not seen any evidence of collusion; is that right? well, evidence that would establish that there is
that is a problem. too many investigations. one special counsel, muriel, one, maybe two at the most d.c. capitol hill type of investigations and that s it. we didn t even need a special council. rod rosenstein felt the heat and oh my god let s appoint somebody. eboni: what s the harm. it may turn out to be a benefit of donald trump. we didn t need it. unhinged apoplectic activist media screaming for it aanalogies. katherine: how does hurt? ignorant if you think this is like watergate. katherine: watergate analogy is ridiculous there were names on that stuff. how could it hurt? eric: this is how it hurts. have you general counsel goes in and bring in a whole ton of people and they will start filing and paging through. they will subpoena everyone. eboni: doing their job, eric. eric: here is what you are going to end up doing. end up opening cans of worms all over the place. the american people want to figure out what s going on with their economy. eboni: some cans n
any you will tierier motive or some type of crazy agenda i m a nice guy. donald trump stuck his hand out. maybe just a little bit to say hello to. say that was uncomfortable circumstance or a hug or something over the top is completely ridiculous. let me go this with you. so this guy says he is a friend of jim comey but not a best friend if you watch the whole thing. but for him not to be that close, i got really close girlfriends. we would have to sit on the phone for 24 hours for them to have this type of detail. don t you know an awful lot to be a loose associate? this is unbelievably petty. he was disgusted. he is the tallest snowflake that i know. this guy, look, is he disgruntled exempt employee home boys calling up pbs call out the guy who fired him for good reason. speak of good reason implicating trump to try to stop an investigation. you know the testimony that
this stuff. we are getting into the petty. of course, as we are getting into the petty today the investigation is becoming more serious because we have the special counsel. so i m going to enjoy today. i m going to enjoy the extent of today being nut jobs and blending into the drapes because, ha ha is the only really response to that. is there any way that from the very beginning when donald trump asked him for his, basically his loyalty, not his honesty, is there any way tha we are missing something that jim comey is in fact a decent guy, wasn t happy about the loyalty pledge, be honest, is there any way that jim comey is being made to look bad here that donald is, in fact, overstepping his boundaries. it s entirely possible. eboni: they are adversarial at this point. katherine: you just said it s impossible. eric: it is impossible because comey serves at the pleasure of the president. as we know, if donald trump said something in a meeting, he has the and you pointed this