to remove catalan regional leaders from office starting with president carlos food article one five five hasn t been to use in spain return to democracy fourteen years ago mr rajoy said that using these special powers was not meant to remove the liberties of catalogs but to protect them carry. catalans the protection not from spanish imperialism but rather from an intolerant minority that has named itself one owner of catalonia this minority considers the cultural and historical heritage belonging to the entire community as its own exclusive province of and it wants to submit all cataloged to the yoke of its secessionist doctrine we thank was for the latest from a cattle on the capital barcelona where we find v.w. correspondent charlotte johnson pill welcome charlotte so what are we expecting well the cattle on president declare independence today. well phil if he s
prime minister did carlos push double declare independence all notes social media reports that this show has been sifting through the twisties feel welcome liz what are you saying. well phil lots of you were asking the very same questions they re not very sure about what catalyst put them on just man to by the speech that he gave yesterday did he declare independence or did he not and even the people who want independence in catalonia they re not sure they re left confused by yesterday s speech let me just show you a crowd that was listening to that speech yesterday two different photos of that very same crowd so first put the one says they have a right to independence everybody is cheering of course they think that s the declaration of independence but then it goes on to say but let s suspend that s declaration of independence and of course that really crashed the people that were hoping for positive news in catalonia and what we re seeing right now on social
f.t. has been engulfed by internal turmoil. let s get more on this from digitally political correspondent simon young who s at the bundestag where the newly elected parliamentary groups are holding their first meetings welcome simon i would frankly petrie s departure affect day after day. well phil despite expressions of surprise that you heard in that piece there i think that it wasn t entirely here a surprise for a patriot become very much detached from the main stream of the f.t. over the last few months she s said it again and again that she doesn t support this hardline right wing of course and you know so for her to leave the party is pretty much just the logical conclusion of her decision yesterday not to join the parliamentary group come as a little sort of bombshell for the media and shows that there are these divisions within the f.t. that people have talked about they re not yet quite
that s just a completely different story. and dr. lewinski s own website says his research has been published in law enforcement plxs and on websites. that just doesn t cut it. it s not been subject to peer voouf. but, mark, mark geragos, let me bring you into this. even if there s not science on the police side to back it up in phil s opinion, a judge can still allow slip and capture, slips and capture in a trial? it was allowed in the oscar grant shooting case. well phil is right in this perfectly legal sense. you have to get over a hurdle. you have to get over the hurdle. you can t just put out and he s using the right term which is junk science, and judges are the gatekeepers. do you allow in this or not allow in this? and you have pre-trial hearings on this. the judge will decide. is this something that s accepted in the scientific community. that s one area will the judge
last 60 years of research that specifically looks at slips and captures captures errors in the medical world, in the aviation industry. i have a journal article we re looking at now dealing with tax taxonmy of medical errors. there s 45 categories dating back to the 1960s. so professor stinson might not be aware of the literature source which is extremely vast and literally covers thousands of journal articles. in fact let me ask phil about that. phil the so-called slips in the medical world, are they relevant? can you apply that to the policing world? from a standpoint of industrial psychology sblul, but the problem here is that slips and capture, in terms of it being admissible and a court of law as expert testimony,