glad to be with you. jeanine: coming up, more reaction to president trump s major america first national security speech. dan bongino and jessica tarlov are next. stay with us.
key american interests in order to make the iranians happier to come to this deal. there wasn t anything obama wasn t prepared to give away and he came very close to giving away the entire this deal wad made in heaven for the iranians. obama was happy to solve it because fundamentally he didn t think that they were the problem.py he thought once he could show that america didn t have a hostile intent that the ayatollahs would join the civilized world and everything would be happy. since they signed the deal in december of 2015, that has e not happened. his premises were wrong, in his negotiation was bad. this deal is terrible and i hope the next demonstration of the america first strategy that we see is the president rejecting the deal in its entirety. jeanine: that certainly is a possibility. it really is amazing, ambassador, that obama, president obama just laid back when it came to everything. i will never forget the prayer breakfast, that first national
it s in mueller s interest to clean up his act and go forward smoothly. jeanine: it s a little late in the game. i think he has lost all credibility, but thanks so much for being with us. and coming up, president trump unveiled his america first national security strategy. we will get reaction from john bolton and from the deputy assistant to the president for strategic communications on the national security council. stay with us.
transition team, there are statutes that apply to them in particular, regulations, memos of understanding. i can get the you have no expectation of privacy on certain servers, but this is surrounded by particular legislation and regulations and memos of understanding. it s outrageous.s. i think it s outrageous. of course. let me tell you the hypocrisy. you have people on the other side making the following two arguments. number one, they say that of course there can t be any privilege because he wasn t a government official. he wasn t the president yet so they can t be exacting privilege. on the other hand they say they were public officials for purposes of getting the emails. you can t have it both ways. you have to pick a theory and they are inconsistent. jeanine: you have to pick a theory but in addition to that, i think what we ve seen with mueller is this whole thing with peter strzok and the woman with whom he was having the affair, lisa page, who worked for the fbi. they are
your committee had oversight over gsa. you are familiar with all of these regulations. why would someone at gsa just say oh, great, they want it, let s give them all these records? because they are deep state possibly? the deep state is alive and well.ly you get a letter from director mueller telling me to turn over those documents. you are not an attorney. they should have gotten some legal advice. basically all gsa does is turn on the lights, provide some office space, give you asi coupe of i.d. badges, and some computers to turn on and say here are some office space that you don t have to try rent and figure this out during the critical time, but they didn t have the right to turn them over, they didn t have possession of them. it wasn t theirs to turn over. jeanine: gregg, now you ve got these lawyers on the mueller team and they know that they are in possession of privileged information.n. they know it. they know the players, they know their jobs. shouldn t those lawyers be br