Were going to start with the Cuban Missile Crisis. Cuban missile crisis was 1962. It took place over 13 very, very stressful days in october 1962. The United States at that point had long been flying High Altitude surveillance flights over the nation of cuba, but on october 14th, 1962 a u2 surveillance flight picked up imagery in cuba of something that started that whole crisis, started that whole standoff. Its interesting. The Cuban Missile Crisis is very precisely identified in all the history books as having started on october 16th. Two days after that u2 spy plane captured those images in cuba. But the crisis didnt start on october 16th because something happened that day, because there was some overt act by cuba, there was some provocation there or some announcement by them, it didnt start because on october 16th there was some act by the
soviet union or some announcement by the soviets that kicked off this crisis. The reason we can be so specific about when the Cuban Missile Cris
Never has the department of justice sent a letter on a weekend and they camtheye to ona two separate days for the sole purpose of intimidating hite dm they have intimidated every one of our witnesses. the biden legal team intimid abl lowell and company. they have more than crossed l an crossthe lineed of witnessh intimidation. you saw what the legalat the tee in the delaware court trying to intimidate another personers to something off the website. there s example afteexamplr the church, but we re going to continue to move this inaura: yeinvestigation. but the question is, what areknw they trying to hide? and trying to i think everyoneis knows what this is. e i mean, even if there s notxp a check that went to joe biden, whether expenses o weres gett covered for his home or he s just happy his son is getting all this monethis mon y. sman forwan, we all kind of know what this is. but, congressman, we look forward to that testimony and he s going to give you the heisman. not going to do
i college years. so interesting. i don e t know manyeople people addicted to xanax because it generally kind of . ke it s much of a downer. what? yeah, that s. this doesn t make sense becauson you re smiling. i would think you d be on an upper. yeah. i don t know if you ve ever been to kentucky, bur.t most of the population in kentucky is addicted to xanax b. you are. you a you are amazing. norew, at your fourth or fifth arrest. was there a point when you realized, hmwas thm, somethh not going in the right direction? ei mean, you just kept going. yeah, yeah, yeah. w you know, while i d be in jail,h i d be like, okay, this is my last time going to jail. i really neeis lasd to clean up my act. and then i would get out, like, a week later and commit another crimget out week late. so you are my favorite side
To come out. what about your fellow teammates who , of course, were all intimidated into silence? e i mean, they were athletes r themselves. they a lot of people. d to rock the boat.ve nev i understand that. that. i ve never been like that, butmn i understand that. what ared you saying to themu decide and what are you hearing from o? them after you ve decided to speak out? ew i haven t heard from many. i have had a few teammates for reach out and thank me for what i m doing. there is supportit. it might be limited, but they are there.e and there are people that understand fairnes sunders and understand biological reality. so i do have hoptaairness e. h and hopefully more girls can spe speak out not just on my team, but in other teams. that have been affected by . and what do you say to moms and dads out there who see thisa train coming down the tracks the for their daughter, who maybe oe is training to be one of the best of the best? definitely speak out as early ao as you can abou
All the time. but a lot of these texts,e i mean, people don t really realize what are in a lot of these texts, like candy, for example, calls for a us department of anti-racism, which would monitor speech forr racist content, whatever that is or isn t. candy, the author of yes, yes, yes. to the exten bt that there justa be this massive surveillance state, even more than the one that we have now in order to make this possible and also a complete destruction of the first amendment. so i think that people say, an okay, this this withoute it. realizing maybe what they re actually saying or maybe they do realizi don t wor. and i don t i don t know which one s worse, honestly. grade point made in suche incisive way. you re always looking for the the libertarian angle. and it s so true that all of these liberal policies, gove government got a big way.nment got terrorists, obviously certainstg people are drawn e to certain professions, professional wrestling, although women are there s many wo