now for dr. oz s part, the former tv host was definitely comfortable on the camera. but he did have a line that may haunt him this halloween saying abortion should be not for the federal government, but, quote, doctors and political leaders one of these things is not like the others. let s go to new york where kathy hochul faced off against lee zeldin. when zeldin was asked after the january 6th attack on the capitol whether he would again vote not to certify the election, couldn t get a straight answer. vote was on two states, pennsylvania and arizona. and the issue remains today, it s about looking forewards, not backwards. these are weasel words. there was no evidence then, and certainly, no evidence now, that could remotely justify trying to overturn the election to keep donald trump in power. so the issue does not remain
Can you destroy a meter other than an irony meter?
scienceblogs.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from scienceblogs.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
primetime. of course, this will be live on cnn and on msnbc, but also on nbc, abc, cbs, other local stations and broadcast areas may decide to carry this. this will be seen almost everywhere expect, of course, for the right-wing media bubble. fox news notably saying it will not carry the hearings in full. fox s primetime shows will cover the hearings, quote, as news warrants. those are weasel words, because of course the entire hearing is a news event. it is a major news event. but fox is instead going to air tucker carlson s usual 8:00 p.m. show. he s a 1/6 denier, so as much as the primetime coverage will matter and folks who might otherwise not watch the news at night will tune in tonight, it s important to recognize there s an entire universe of media that exists to oppose this committee, to oppose finding out the truth, and whether any of tonight s news breaks through, i think it s a very open question. yeah, and to that point, although fox won t carry the hearings tonight, they
so, either. definitely not a slam dunk. 14th amendment section 3 your favorite amendment. not my favorite but right up there. is in the constitution and it s not constitution for a reason, it was put in after the civil war to ensure that people serving in congress who participated, aided or abetted in an insurrection were not able to serve again unless they were basically allowed in by two-thirds vote of congress. that law was passed in the constitution with an idea that it would be prospective not only retrospective. i think this is premature, we don t have the full january 6th report, we don t know what the members of congress did. if it ultimately comes out with clear evidence that members of congress aided or abet this had insurrection attempt then that can be a real conversation. this seems to be premature and risks a degree of political backlash. she has a primary coming up, a general election, this is a heavily republican district but the voters are the ones to hold her