many similar movements that arae on the way. inevitably, and the few visionaries who have grasped this obvious truth weirdly , have not been welcomed by blue am america. they have been mockeda, they and derided as prophets, always are. a fewfe years ago, foro, example, a blue blond woman from montana called rachel dolezal declared that she wanas black because she decided that she was black . blackness was rachel dolezald lived experience, but she was not greeted as liberators. t gr she was almost immediateh booed off the stage and then she disappearee d and tellingly, none of the people yelling atye rachel dolezal ever explained whdy she couldn t be black. why not?t? in this country, you can change your , but not your race. really, how does that work? what species of science are weec talking about here? it was note are we defensible al and so over time, like alle ar indefensible arguments, it will collapse someday. the new york times will give g rachel dough s all its
tory , a new one . and the lunatics in thisey did administration is very obvious that they did that . how does nato survive this tugger? nato i?s not surviving this.s oi that s very obvious.ou if you go behind the scenes,n in there is enormous division in nato over what should happen next. and more and more of the truthou is coming out about ukraine. not only are the ukrainians not winning, people are discoveringp that the ukrainianeopls were tur into a weapon ofusa mass destruction aimed at russia by usby. and this is something the europeans really never signed up for. right. president is absolutely right. the other thing is that er the president gave you a veryprn prudent answer. he said he reallhe saiy didn t s and that s true. we can tiv know unless we receih a briefing from the highest levels. y but he s also very concerned that if he were to say yes, soli that would put our soldiers, woilors, airmen and marines all over the world at risk. targets they would instantly become tar