private texts disparaging candidate trump. in one of the texts strzok said we ll stop trump from becoming hearing. tomorrow chris wray and rod rosenstein will be questioned about the watchdog report on the probe of hillary clinton s emails. vindication for president trump. the third version of his travel ban, a version he once called watered down, now upheld by the supreme court. this is a great victory for our constitution. we have to be tough, and we have to be safe. we have to be secure. at a minimum, we have to make sure that we vet people coming into the country. we know who s coming in. we know where they re coming from. we just have to know who s coming here. the 5-4 ruling gives the president broad powers to restrict travel in the name of national security. and the majority essentially disregarded his campaign statements calling for a muslim ban. the high court s swing vote,
the supreme court. this is a great victory for our constitution. we have to be tough, and we have to be safe, and we have to be secure. at a minimum, we have to make sure that we vet people coming into the country. we know who s coming in, we know where they re coming from. we just have to know who s coming here. the 5-4 ruling recognizes that the president has broad powers to restrict travel in the name of national security, and the majority essentially disregarded his campaign statements calling for a muslim ban. the high court s swing vote, justice kennedy, sided with the majority. he sent a message to the president in a concurring opinion saying, quote, the fact that an official may have broad discretion, discretion free from judicial scrutiny, makes it all the more imperative for him or author adhere to the constitution and its meaning and its promise. many are waiting to see if justice kennedy will retire,
out a tremendous success and tremendous victory for the american people, and for our constitution. this is a great victory for our constitution. we have to be tough and we have to be safe and we have to be secure. at a minimum, we have to make sure that we vet people coming into the country. we know who is coming in. we know where they are coming from. we just have to know who is coming here. the ruling shows that all of the attacks from the media and the democrat politicians are wrong and they turned out to be very wrong. tucker: as you might imagine, democrats are taking this so well. usually they rely on the court system and activist judges on the west coast to push their agenda, but after this judicial victory for the trump administration, they are lashing out angrily and of course claiming racism. as congressman keith ellison wrote, this gives legitimacy to
department should have stayed with the original travel ban, not the watered-down politically correct version they submitted to the supreme court. yesterday the president celebrated the justices decision. a tremendous success, a tremendous victory for the american people. and for our constitution. this is a great victory for our constitution. we have to be tough and we have to be safe and we have to be secure. at a minimum we have to make sure that we vet people coming into the country we know who is coming in. we know where they re coming from. we just have to know who s coming here. the ruling shows that all of the attacks from the media and the democrats politicians are wrong and they turned out to be very wrong. so professor jonathan turley, let s talk about what the supreme court did and did not rule yesterday. it was not, it seems to me, a commentary by the majority on the policy itself. but rather on the president s
and we have to be secure. at a minimum, we have to make sure that we vet people coming into the country. we know who s coming in. we know where they re coming from. we just have to know who s coming here. the ruling shows that all of the attacks from the media and the democrat politicians are wrong, and they turned out to be very wrong. so barbara mcquade, we ve been talking this morning about what this 5-4 decision means and what it does not mean. your reading of it this morning. last hour, jonathan turley said, this really was more about the president s authority to make this policy and not a commentary by the court on the policy itself. well, it s really interesting to note. first, there was a 5-4 decision. and i think one can t help but wonder what the decision might have been if we had justice merrick garland on the court as opposed to justice neil gorsuch. but if you look at the opinion written by justice roberts, he goes through great pains to talk