a child s point of view. why don t you let stanley cut your hair? i lost my money. you have the character of we ver and wally who usually does things right. beaver s always the one that gets in trouble. and there were the patients to teach them. show them the right path. we want you to feel that you can come to me or to your mother with any problem and we ll understand. in the 1950s sitcoms were really giving us an idealistic version of america. but as we get into the 60s we ll see different types of family sitcoms. i m sure i ll be able to handle it. a little cooking and wash ing.
we ve had grass roots organizers. we ver had mothers who lost their children. to violence or to bad policing. we ve had the span of people even republicans and people that adamantly disagree with me because if has been our intngz to bring it real and to bring it to you so you can have the information and make your own judgment. people know i have an opinion but what we need is information and learn how we can talk and disagree without being disagreeable. i have had a great team here for eight years and moving forward in even greater team. and we ve had a lot of support and the ones i really want to thank is you, the viewers that have consistently watched.
perspectiven what he ehad to saw. i think there are a number of things going on here. we have a president and a team behind him who actually feel that richard nixon didn t go far enough in resisting conflict. they looked back at the history and think nixon wasn t tough enough. so we have a stone wall presidency. they re not giving congress anyone to testify about almost anything. so he s they re daring cong troosz go tocourt with this. and we ve talked a lot about constitutional crisis but this would bring to us to an actual constitutional crisis if the legislative branch and executive branch face off in the judiciary. we re now hurdling towards i think a more extreme conflict than we ver had with nixon and watergate and i m not sure the president really minds. i think he sees this paying off.
incredulity among some that this meeting is still going on. the president hasn t given any indication that he wants to take a hard line with president trump on this. i mean what he s been saying is he essentially expectsputen to deny it. to continue to deny it it and what we ver heard from president trump on twitter is similar. when this was announced, what president trump tweeted was that putin denies meddling in the u.s. election. so it was almostputing out putin s own line, echoing the words of the kremlin instead of the u.s. intelligence community and now the department of justice. unclear exactly how he will raise this. every indication so far is that he fully expects what the answer will be, that it will be deni
peppered with questions about russia and his conversations with even he is still dialled in on what s going on. has the white house, anyone had any comment about the hearings today? we ver had no official response. i spoke with a spokesperson for the president s personal lawyer. he said he would not be putting out a statement today. it s possible we could hear from the white house on this. they re on their way back from wisconsin right now. and sarah huck aeb sanders is with reporters. so far the white house has been pretty mum on this, anderson. back for a second to the attorney general s meeting last year at a may flower hotel in washington. a key moment some sort of exchange at a vip gathering. and before that, video of the recession. and you see the ambassador,