Nuclear facilities should never be a target in military conflicts. Irans semi official tasnim news agency, which is close to the Islamic Revolutionary guard corps, posted a video with a caption saying. Isfahan s nuclear site is completely safe. In the video, a man near the Isfahan Nuclear Technology Centre is seen showing his watch to the camera to indicate the time and date. We can then see several troops standing around what looks like an air defence battery. Reuters newsagency is reporting that an unnamed iranian source has said there is no immediate plan for retaliation. As well as these explosions in iran, they were reported, too, in Southern Syria apparently from missiles targeting radar sites. And there were also blasts in iraq in the capital baghdad. And babil province to the south. Israel had promised to respond to irans drone and Missile Attack on saturday night. Both nbc and cnn have reported unnamed Officials Saying that israel warned washington, but that washington did not
the ball is in iran s court, all eyes will be on them. they appear to have been playing eyes will be on them. they appear to have been playing down eyes will be on them. they appear to have been playing down the - have been playing down the significance of this this morning, although just significance of this this morning, althoughjust on significance of this this morning, although just on wednesday we were told that they would be retaliation, so where do you think the messaging that we are hearing this morning leaves us on that escalator we path? iran is going to take its time making a decision, as it did earlier. when it sent the missiles into israel two weeks after its consular was bombed in syria. so, iran is a very careful player. it wants to show that it is unfazed by the attack by israel but it will take its time when it responds i do feel that their response it takes will be measured but it may not necessarily do something, we will have to see how they will respond but i do
the near term at least, we don t how shake out the long term. and yet you don t have the votes to overcome the filibuster and say, that s that, and whether resigned towards authoritarianism and which we path. the gap between the rhetoric, and what people want to do for those last few votes is so difficult for people to watch play out. it is, chris. just to add even more sense of urgency. i say all the time, the most important year in voting rights is the year that ends in a one. we re in that year, now. because you have a census and you have you redistribution. if you try to plot the years and the amount of shine again and against that occur. the year the ends and the one is invariably the year with a motion and against. i know that because ten years ago i sued texas, and we won. guess what? we won in no small measure, because, texas had the burden