here, where you have this competing element of maybe you ll get a reduced sentence from the court. maybe you ll get a pardon from the president, everything s kind of turned on its head, and the prosecutors mentioned that in this hearing, they said this is one of the reasons they felt that manafort had been holding back, had not been telling the whole truth, he was trying to play his odds and trying to keep the possibility of a pardon open, which is dangerous for a cooperating witness, and absolutely infuriating for the government. michael schmidt, do we please engage in rampant speculation if you wish. when do you think we will next hear from the mueller effort, did the grand jury sit today for example in washington, when do you think the next utterance will be? you sound like my editor. look, we don t know, and speculating about it is hard, it s been very hard to get inside of mueller s head and what they re going to do. this clearly looks like something that s still very
when the president says looking at his finances outside of russia, would be across that red line. that only applies to mueller. congress can look at whatever it wants, it s a separate body of government, they don t answer to the president, they can choose to what they think is relevant. and that could be his finances that go beyond the russia investigation. a lot of people believe that those tax returns have been in a locked drawer in mueller s desk for the better part of two years. we have restrictions on who can go rooting around in who s tax returns. could this fight that this subcommittee is about to wage could we talk about months or years of fighting over this? certainly could be. any time you may end unin court to have a fight about what congress can have under subpoena, it could be tied up for a very long time. we re also talking about something, if it happened to go all the way to the supreme court. we don t know what the supreme court would decide. because remember, tha
on the executive power vested in the president of the united states. mr. mueller cannot subpoena the president because the only way apresident to be held accountable whether it s allegedly criminal or not is through impeachment . nothing else. chris: i want to bring lanny davis and because there s never been a case exactly like this. doing a quick history lesson this week, over the course of our history, thomas jefferson, richard nixon and your client, bill clinton have all been forced to submit to court orders. can president trump be subpoenaed to testify? first of all, mr. joseph digenova. who i ve known for a great deal of years and have tremendous respect for. we don t know what the supreme court will do and it will ultimately be a supreme court question. presidentclinton decided to accept voluntary voluntarily
on the executive power vested in the president of the united states. mr. mueller cannot subpoena the president because the only way apresident to be held accountable whether it s allegedly criminal or not is through impeachment . nothing else. chris: i want to bring lanny davis and because there s never been a case exactly like this. doing a quick history lesson this week, over the course of our history, thomas jefferson, richard nixon and your client, bill clinton have all been forced to submit to court orders. can president trump be subpoenaed to testify? first of all, mr. joseph digenova. who i ve known for a great deal of years and have tremendous respect for. we don t know what the supreme court will do and it will ultimately be a supreme court question. presidentclinton decided to accept voluntary voluntarily
so the people who already were having health insurance and being responsible are being punished. exactly. and then there are, i think it s something like 80% of the people you bring up a really key point, it s the subsidies. and when the supreme court looks at those 36, 37 states and makes some real hard decisions or not we don t know what the supreme court s going to do to tucker s point a big issue for hemo. who s paying for these subsidies, tucker? people with jobs are paying for it. they think it s free money, but everybody, you mentioned the middle class. this is an opportunity for the republicans to seize the middle class i think about they would. i know. it s the only thing i ve ever agreed with schumer on, he was totally right in his analysis. i want to ask you though, as sandra points out, no one ever thought premiums would go down because you can t have a bunch of sick people, right? they said no more preconditions. a bunch of sick people pou