for the chance at clear or almost clear skin. it s like the feeling of finding your back. is back. or finding psoriasis can t deny the splendor of these thighs. once-daily sotyktu is proven to get more people clearer skin than the leading pill. don t take if you re allergic to sotyktu; serious reactions can occur. sotyktu can lower your ability to fight infections including tb. serious infections, cancers including lymphoma, muscle problems, and changes in certain labs have occurred. tell your doctor if you have an infection, liver or kidney problems, high triglycerides, or had a vaccine or plan to. sotyktu is a tyk2 inhibitor. tyk2 is part of the jak family. it s not known if sotyktu has the same risks as jak inhibitors. find what plaque psoriasis has been hiding. ask your dermatologist about sotyktu for clearer skin. so clearly you. sotyktu.
with wet amd, sometimes i worry my world is getting smaller because of my sight. but now, i can open up my world with vabysmo. vabysmo is the first fda-approved treatment for people with wet amd that improves vision and delivers a chance for up to 4 months between treatments. which means doing more of what i love. vabysmo is the only treatment designed to block 2 causes of wet amd. vabysmo is an eye injection. don t take it if you have an infection or active swelling in or around your eye, or are allergic to it or any of its ingredients. treatments like vabysmo can cause eye infection or retinal detachment. vabysmo may cause a temporary increase in eye pressure after receiving the injection. although uncommon, there is a potential risk of heart attack or stroke associated with blood clots. open up your world! a chance for up to 4 months between treatments with vabysmo. ask your doctor.
have been pretty well frozen, in part because of the spy balloon, but in part because it s just a fundamental disagreement about what the future of the relationship would look like. with the u.s. saying, look, we can compete in a whole number of ranges, technology, trade, even some security issues, but there are areas where we can go cooperate. and the chinese saying, you can t really have a bifurcated kind of relationship like that. how concerning is it to you, general, when you look at how much those relationships between the military side of things have deteriorated? it s really troubling. it s really troubling. look, we have scar tissue that s been acquired over the years, where if there s an incident, if there s a challenge at the very highest levels, there will be open, there will be very honest and calm communications. david indicated those don t exist anymore. and that s the biggest concern. i mean, you can mix into this the conventional challenges that we see across the se
won t use our equipment to strike inside russia. once it goes to them, it belongs bo to them that sounds like a hospital. respectfully, that sounds like a hedge. it s not. it s been consistent since the beginning of the war. this equipment belongs to them. they to get to decide how they use it. we don t want we have been clear privately with them and certainly clear publicly. we don t want our systems, we don t want to encourage or able attacks inside russia. okay. president zelenskyy has said that there is a date now, he has a date for the counteroffensive. do you have any sense of that timing is? i think we are just going to leave it right there. this is president zelenskyy s decision to make. he is the commander-in-chief. he gets to decide where and when he steps off. we don t want to get ahead of him on that. does the white house know even though you are not saying it publicly? we have been in touch with our ukraine counterparts as they have begun their planning for
who went to the mall to celebrate, but there were also those who went to protest, and that at a protest in trafalgar square, it appears some people were arrested for quite a peaceful protest. do you think that that was appropriate? in peaceful protest. do you think that that was appropriate? that was appropriate? in terms of the appmpriate that was appropriate? in terms of the appropriate see, that was appropriate? in terms of the appropriate see, i that was appropriate? in terms of the appropriate see, i think - that was appropriate? in terms of the appropriate see, i think no. . that was appropriate? in terms of the appropriate see, i think no. i | the appropriate see, i think no. i think the appropriate see, i think no. i think what the appropriate see, i think no. i think what we are beginning to see is an infringement on our ability to have is an infringement on our ability to have free is an infringement on our ability to have free speech, and i think that was a ha