that. i think they re waiting, probably playing, that the president doesn t screw it up again. politics aside, i sort of tried to explain what s in this deal compared to the last time. if you don t follow this very closely, it s unclear as to who this is a win for and whether this goes any distance towards actually fixing what s broken with our immigration system. ways yo what s your take? 50 miles of a fence is not going to fix the problem. let s focus on who s winning and losing here. i ve been really shocked to hear conservative media sean hannity talk about this being a garbage compromise. i don t want to question your big board, but one thing missing from it was the $5.7 billion allocated in that first go-around, that would only have funded 110 miles of new wall. oh, let me just point something out. that was not on a.mli s big boa
terrorism analyst malcolm nance. ways yo what s your take here? that was a brilliant discussion between the chief and your compatriot there. it s all very true. we have a lone actor who has used the subway and metro system to come through from wherever he launched, his little safe house as he might see it, come up into the port authority and final a channelized area where there is a large number of commuters and he attempted to detonate a device. the very fact the device did not fully explode and injured only him is a testimony to his incompetent. if this is what isis is throwing at us, you can see they had more effectiveness with a truck than they would an explosive device and we should feel lucky and it is a testament to the effectiveness and the fear that new york city police department is putting into these people, that they cannot have an organized plan. they have to have individuals with disorganized plans in order
to have a congressman in new york city sitting beside me. i ll throw one more piece of spaghetti at the piece if i can and that is the benghazi committee. person number three coming out and suggesting this committee to investigate what happened in benghazi was specifically motivated by the politics of hillary clinton. as kevin mccarthy suggested, the poll numbers for hillary clinton came down after benghazi, the investigative committee launched its work. and now we have representative richard hanna, republican, from new york. these people were not caught on secret recordings. they said so of their own volition. kevin mccarthy was in a live interview. this is troublesome for the republicans. this is troublesome for a policy the republicans have held tenaciously. it could be troublesome for the race as well. ways yo what s your response to now number three coming out against this motivation? let me tell yowl what i know from firsthand experience. because before the select