it s true, swain win, they have had a lot of whips like that michigan was a classic example, where there is no good reason mitt romney should have had his whole nomination at stake in his home state, and given rick santorum and everything else going on by a mere three point bus again, that turned out to be the pivotal moment, we knew it would be pivotal but in a way we couldn t have anticipated, going into mich, much of the republican establishment, to the extent such a thing really exists was nervous about mitt romney and ready to abandon him if he lost in michigan. he then wins michigan as narrowly as he did, then all the stuff that s happened since then in terms of the polling, the limbaugh controversy, everything else it has become very vivid and dramatic how much this nomination fight is hurting mitt romney s prospects against barack obama in the fall. the establishment ready to abandon him a week ago has now rallied around him. they are going to be very receptive to all the argum
clearly off the charts in his comments about president obama, that i think it s also hurt their credibility and really turned off independent voters as well. you know, the article quotes a tea party leader saying that there would not have been a tea party without fox. what do you think? no question. absolutely no question. fox gave the tea party coverage early on when it wasn t much of a movement when they couldn t get more than 600 or 700 people to come to washington in the middle of the health care debate and it gave them credibility. so does it hurt the republican party in your opinion? in retrospect has ailes shot himself in the foot so to speak? i think it helped them in 2010 because certainly the tea party brought people into the political system to vote for the first time. but i think in 2012 it ll be disastrous for them. they re losing independent voters. they ve, as you know, because you said it many times, stimulated the democratic base which was down in the dumps aft
election, stimulated in a way we couldn t do ourselves so i think in terms of roger wanting to win elections it s going to turn out to back fire dramatically. what about chris christie? number one, do you think he ll get in? what do you make of now there are some pretty big republicans who are actually trying to recruit him to get in. well, i think chris christie is a smart guy. i think he knows that everything changes when he becomes a presidential candidate, that all of a sudden he s going to have to deliver on foreign policy. all of a sudden he is going to have to talk about issues that are more broad than just saying we can t spend money anymore. i think he believes he s not ready. does chris christie want to run for president some day? heck, ed, we all do. anybody who got elected governor, there s an old saying that there are 50 presidents in waiting. but i think chris christie is smart enough to figure out what the best time for him to run is and i think if he s looking at
missiles does it frustrate you to see your vision of a nuclear free world disappearing does live reasonable on its next remain a dangerous situation clearly. a concern that iran could soon have a nuclear weapons program at its disposal and become one more nuclear power instead of us moving towards a nuclear free world was justified. of course there s always a risk that agreements may be grecian or sidestepped this particular deal guaranteed scrutiny in a way we couldn t have without it. it s imperative that we keep this deal. i mean it s one of the diplomatic success stories of recent years and america has to do all she can now to convince donald trump not to break off the deal if that will be playing with fire deploy up or because president french president or manuel mccaw said he believes the u.s. president really will scrap the deal this is the reality we have to face at the age
a nuclear free world disappearing those letters number one it s an extremely dangerous situation clearly. a concern that iran could soon have a nuclear weapons program at its disposal and become one more nuclear power instead of us moving towards a nuclear free world was justified. of course there s always a risk that agreements may be green or sidestepped this particular deal guaranteed scrutiny in a way we couldn t have without it. it s imperative that we keep this deal for me it s one of the diplomatic success stories of recent years and america has to do all she can now to convince donald trump not to break off the deal if that will be playing with fire. or because president french president or manuel mcconnell said he believes the us president really will scrap the deal this is the reality we have to face at the age of thirty three one could describe you as a grandchild of the peace movement you keep