MSNBC The 11th Hour With Brian Williams November 8, 2019 09:47:30 archive.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from archive.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
that they continue to do so in a quiet way? you get a really interesting debate about this from liberals and people that don t like ut president trump and say this is not necessarily the best way tom go about, you know, mounting il resistance.yo you have others who say look, this is a patriot that believesh his or her country is doing thee best they can to keep it c together with a mercurial commander in chief. it s an interesting time and interesting debate this provoked. let s continue it. i d ask you all, if you can, to stay with us. coming up, house democrats are hoping investigation no-shows will help them build the impeachment case against president trump as they release more damming testimony against asm. and later, mike bloomberg is said to be worried democrats g won t be able to defeat donald trump and that his him rethinking his own future. the 11th hour just getting started on a thursday night. the 11th hour just getting started on a thursday night. if you have medic
former chairman of the republican national committee, the host of the appropriately named michael steele pod cast and my friend. there is one man having a good night tonight but the democratic senator from alabama doug jones because he s thinking there might be a jeff sessions roy moore primary to be the republican senatorial candidate in alabama. yeah, and one that the president will likely inject himself into in such a way that it will create what is already a muddled mess, an even bigger mess. the interesting thing about this, there is a dynamic to watch here, ali, and that is exactly how and to what extent the president goes after jeff sessions. now, keep in mind, their relationship is bad, but jeff sessions relationship with south carolina is damn good. and so there is a risk for the president that he goes after sessions in such a way that it harms his own relationship with the voters of south carolina
president is diminished. me that s right. exactly. the first generation of people, the second generation of people that have worked is gone. this is the highest of modern times and with each successful i instillation of everybody and various cabinet positions and white house positions, you re u finding a president looking for somebody to basically keep, let him be trump. let trump be trump. he has no longer as much patience for aids telling him what to do and what not to do and this is the way things should be done or shouldn t be done. that s a frustration for anonymous, whoever he or she is. this raised a really interesting question. the question is debated within washington and government circles is at what point does a person who disagrees with the president so strenuously, at what point is it then incumbent on that person to lead the government and say so on the record with a name attached? is it fair to a president, any president to have someone insid who disagrees with him so
of the entire process, he calls it anonymous, gutless, coward.ir there is a journalistic history of protecting people for purposes set to serve the public interest. et that s exactly right. i would add to your point, phil, i don t know who this person is, the new york times editorial page does. they published his piece or herh piece a year ago but the newsroom does not know or i don t know the white house team does not know, we re separate i our organization. you re right. this the reasoning i think ht that the editorial page people gave is that like the times when we used anonymous sources to provide important information s for our readers, they thought po this was an exception to the t rule where we normally identify writers of op ed pieces, the character and writer they were talking about was sufficient importance to alert the public. clearly, the publishers feel the same way. now it s a stunt obviously