democratic party on the house intel committee to agree with you, congressman? that this has to be done in a way that s methodical to the american people know the truth or do you expect obstruction? i think there will be some obstruction. they will accuse us of trying to deflect the issue away from russia. we are going to go ahead with it. we have to go ahead with it. to me, i m one of those that believes we have to examine the russia issue as far as we possibly can and also this. right now to me, there is more credible accusations, if you will, on the side against susan rice than there is against president trump when it comes to russia. bill: now do you see it in the senate as being an obstructionist thing on the senate intel committee or do you think they are going to cooperate?mi i think they will cooperate. we have really locked arms throughout this investigation from the very beginning which was for us months ago in the starting that we agreed we are going to go where the fac
the page 16, the paper of watergate. buried in, that runs to msnbc today they don t ask her why she lied three weeks ago, this susan rice, i know nothing. bill: i don t think it s faio to say she lied, but it is fair to say that the interviewer did not say gee, on march 22nd, you said.this. right. to refresh everybody s memories, including gutfeld who is kind of zoning out here in the conversation.in ms. rice said that she didn t know anything about any trump surveillance but today she told the interviewer that, yes, but i didn t do anything wrong and i didn t leak anything and it was just my natural function as a national security advisor. so the two statements weren t put side by side. nor was she asked who instructed you, if anybody to do this. bill: she didn t have to because she said, quote,sh i didn t do any nobody to nothing. nothing to nobody. double negative. double negative. by the way, if she were a republican, would be
to the audience, ladies, right before we went on, i told you both very politelyy and in a charming way. very charming. bill: i don t want any talking points. we know that both parties send talking points to people like you, tv analysts every morning. and the democratic talking points is this is just tos object secure the russian investigation, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. and the republican talking points is rice is guilty. she should be deported or beheaded. one of the two. i don t want anything like that. what we want, lisa, is t what you heard on this program so far, what has piqued your interest the most. look, i think we should get to the bottom of this. first and foremost regarding this, there is potential legal ramifications as senator lankford put out ifam some of this information is true regarding susan rice and some of the motivesf behind what she did, if she did unmask these names. there could be legal ramifications. we also know the illegal
can i tell you that the judge can go by the law andnt it can also be influenced to pursue it by politics? bill: no. you can t tell me that it s got to be just the law. you cannot tell me that somebody is liberal that they can interpret the law in a different way than it s written. that s not what i m saying. they are more encouraged to pursue it. two party consent. bill: that s where they got these people. but they are going to say this was journalism, undercover journalism. this is what we do. i can t predict the outcomede because, you are right, ins california it s different than texas. and some judges do rule on politics, which is a-i damn shame.. ladies, as always, thank you. gutfeld and mcguirk on deck. the liberal reaction to the susan rice story. wow. the boys are next.
all right. heaven forbid. bill: and starts to yell and scream, and i go to james over here, get him out of here, they are going to be able to sue me. this judge is being construed by saying that you were kind of encouraging some type of violent action. bill: encouraging james to get him out of here. gutfeld and mcguirk. bill: i hope you understand how insane this. i do, yeah. bill: a president can be sued. in the clinton years, that became very clear only for actions, by the way he or she does before they re president.y yeah. bill: can t so i expect this somewhere along the line to be tossed. can you imagine? bill: i know. that s why i m doing it it s so insane. people have to remember on this type of preliminary thing though, the judge has to convey what s in the complaint is fact. he is not bound by that. bill: i m not criticizing the judge here. i m just saying the whole thing is insane. all right. now, in california the crew