this bud light controversy. just listen to the controversy on the street that were upset this has gotten taken so far out of hand. it s quite simple, people just don t want it shoved down their throat. no bud light. because it s like i have grandchildren. we don t need to put that in the young kids heads. he had one guy who said i refused to drink that anymore. one guy, and everybody else rolled their eyes at him. yeah, america is really split on a lot of topics, whether it comes to voting but this bud light has a chasm down the middle. we went to nashville. and talked to one bar in chicago. one bar said they re not going to serve it because they don t like the way mulvaney was treated after this started. he, vof course, was the transgender person who was going to stand for bud light but they
for this people in the previous segment, taking the fall for the president. what put them in legal jeopardy. they are. the country is in trouble, too. mulvaney. these are two guys in the sidewalk when the bus is coming and they re struggling on who s going to get thrown under. trump or rudy giuliani. you know this. i have been watching for a couple of days, the president and rudy giuliani, they have not always been close. they have an off and on relationship, love and hate throughout the decade. for a long time, he was really upset with rudy and now he and the president remaining close through all of this drama. do you think that can change? these are two maniacs and they re out for themselves. the president is out for himself. rudy is out for himself. which one is going to go down
here is michael d antoni. good evening, to both of you. absolutely immunity is what they are asserting. is that a real thing? no, they are made-up things. coming out of the nixon s impeachment, people had to testify. tom foreman ran a show how much evidence there are. mulvaney clearly is a participant in this. so maybe instead of the insanity defense, maybe it ought to be the fifth amendment. you said this absolutely immunity, you said it is a
testify on capitol hill, we reviewed their testimony, they repeated mulvaney multiple times. he was the contact for sondland and the eu ambassador at the heart of this. it was mulvaney according to other u.s. government officials, it was mulvaney who was at the direction of trump freezing the nearly $400 million in u.s. security assistance to ukraine, at the heart of the matter in addition to the earlier depression of the quid pro quo for having a meeting with president trump. i think he s essential figure in this. he has not been as much discussed as others but clearly he s a essential figure. interesting. matthew. rudy giuliani and sondland and mulvaney were freelancing and not following trump s order. that s clearly add odds with the evidence. you connect the president
mulvaney like some other said he won t testify. the white house dismissing all proceedings less evidence for this illegitimate impeachment sham. the whistleblower s lawyers sent the president demanding he stop attacking his client. the whistleblower is a disgrace to our country. he should be sued and maybe for treason. i don t mean any disrespect but it must suck to be that dump. at a trump s rally, speaker of the house, nancy pelosi and others drew huge cheers but closer to the hearing room as the evidence mounts. lawmakers are dodging questions of the president s behavior. when they tried to explain it well. what i can tell you it was in