34% say he is being honest and truthful. what s the significance of that? sit a bad number to start with. this is why it is so important that the house do this with dignity and be careful about this. watergate nixon started off with good numbers. the house of representatives has to make a case to the american people that is fair and thoughtful. it cannot do what those guys did in benghazi. they have to be fair and as nonpartisan as they can be. that number will get worse for trump as it did for nixon. okay. i will leave it there unless you have anything to add to that. i completely agree with the governor. there we go. thank you so much.
have to resist this urge to say nutty things. in the past when republicans get into this situation, everyone wants to out do themselves or out do their fellow republicans and they say nuttier and nuttier things and it turns what could be a political winner into a political loser because people start to feel sorry for the president or the democrats are going after him. and prominent conservatives, jim, have come out and said things like that. charles krauthammer said let s drop the watergate nixon impeachment jail, drop that talk for now until we have more details. if that becomes appropriate later then you can use those terms but as donnie has been pointing out it sort of delegitimizes you when you reach that far when we ve only just begun. especially when you have if you think of all three scandals at this point, benghazi, the ap, and what is happening with the irs, there is no evidence yet that touches the president and his inner circle. there is no doubt that especially the irs
brought in to work on that scandal. in watergate nixon fired the special prosecutor. he told the attorney general to fire the special prosecutor and he resigned in protest and told the deputy attorney general to fire the special prosecutor and finally got somebody else so he did get rid of him. congress was mad and really not happy about it. they eventually let nixon install a new special prosecutor for watergate but only on the condition the senate judiciary committee would sign off on it with a majority vote if nixon wanted to fire him too. the watergate hearings sprawled all through 1973 and he resigned
of money. in watergate in the 70s, there was a problem with the special prosecutor idea who nixon brought in to work on that scandal. in watergate nixon fired the special prosecutor. he told the attorney general to fire the special prosecutor and he resigned in protest and told the deputy attorney general to fire the special prosecutor and finally got somebody else so he did get rid of him. congress was mad and really not happy about it. they eventually let nixon install a new special prosecutor for watergate but only on the condition the senate judiciary committee would sign off on it with a majority vote if nixon wanted to fire him too.