excuse me, in the fuel pond, they did not say how much water nor did they say whether or not the pods were exposed. what do you make of that, jim? well, i think actions speak louder than words. so if we re at the point now where we have helicopters who are throwing water at both at reactor four s spent fuel pod and also number three, which the iaea has highlighted as being a second separate problem with respect to the nuclear waste being stored outside of the reactor, then if they re doing that, that means they re worried. if you re forced to the point where you have to do this, that indicates that you have a significant problem. the likelihood that you re going to make this work with helicopters seems very low to me. there s an accuracy problem. there s a water volume problem. can you get enough water, can you sustain this overtime.
louder than words. so if we re at the point now where we have helicopters who are throwing water at both at reactor four s spent fuel pod and also number three, which the iaea has highlighted as being a second separate problem with respect to the nuclear waste being stored outside of the reactor, then if they re doing that, that means they re worries. if you re forced to the point where you have to do this, that indicates that you have a significant problem. the likelihood that you re going to make this work with helicopters seems very low to me. there s an accuracy problem. there s a water volume problem. can you get enough water, can you sustain this overtime. the helicopter operators, what they might be exposed to, you would never choose this as your first option. you re only doing this because things have gotten pretty bad. michael freelander, where