Supply projects which is front and sent ner the discussion right now. So the concern is well taken and i want to assure you that were going to bring these projects to successful completion. I would like to add with those projects, we knew about those hazards quite some time ago, and so the progression of time is getting a bit unmanageable in my point of view. Can i just respond to her. Keep in mind, there were 80 so projects that weve been marching and completing and, you know, making some major progress. The ones that weve been having issues with, weve been reporting on. Weve been reporting on and the main one is calvarise. That is something that, you know, weve been working with bsawsca and our stakeholders, and we want to built it in a way that it can withstand a seismic event as it was intended on. While been fine ago lot of trace faults which weve been addressing, so do you want to talk more about that. If i may, certainly on certainly on large programs, theres a concern of creepi
Windmill replacement facility and well rebuild those once our west side recycled Water Project gets approved and part of that phase two construction would include one mile of pipeline. The central pump station well facility shown on this figure is located west of the existing central pump station which is the main Irrigation Pump station for Golden Gate Park. And that pump station is located within the wood waste and composting area in the park. This is almost in the center of Golden Gate Park. The total building high is 1900. This facility will include connections from our we well to the pump station and it will allow the use of the system in case of an emergency. Once recycled water comes in as the Irrigation Water supply, this facility would allow back up for that recycled water system as well. This is a view of the landscape plan for the central pump station well facility. Landscaping would include a low berm and some trees and slubs to better screen the facility from public views
He found exculpations, its a needle in a hay stake. The land slide we did find was apart of the redesign and the redesign is we move 3 million cubic feet of soil. It takes time and effort to move 3 million cubic yards of soil. That was the two year nine month delay that came to this commission in april. We are delayed but its because of one project. We havent seen creeping delays due to lack of attention, and on alameda creek, it could not go into implementation until we finished apart of the program anyway, so a relook at that has benefited us. And so in that case, the delays have been both positive on quality project and on cost of product. So yes, we are committing to immediating were committed to this project. Thank you for input. Every meeting, we have a different calendar goal in terms of completion. I just want you to be aware of the fact that were aware of the fact that it changes all the time. We dont seem to have any fixed goal. We have a fixed goal now, and thats 2019. And i
Clara Water District with east bay mud and haward. Theres a question where the water supply may come in a long term disruption and one you would get in the failure of that tunnel. This is something that this commission should be concerned about. Its not an immediate answer, but when we talk about emergency preparedness, we want to know where that water is going to come from and what plans need to come into place. Mr. Ritchies letter talks about in extreme measures, the puc will request Emergency Support from the arrogation district or the state wide project. Im aware that any emergency agreements exist with these entities. I think thats a great idea. If San Francisco is working on agreements, when will they be completed. These are not the agreements youve been talking about to meet the service goal, or long term transfer, truly an emergency agreement in the event that you lose that tunnel. I would strongly encourage you to move forward with securing those a greems and direct your staff
Sent ner the discussion right now. So the concern is well taken and i want to assure you that were going to bring these projects to successful completion. I would like to add with those projects, we knew about those hazards quite some time ago, and so the progression of time is getting a bit unmanageable in my point of view. Can i just respond to her. Keep in mind, there were 80 so projects that weve been marching and completing and, you know, making some major progress. The ones that weve been having issues with, weve been reporting on. Weve been reporting on and the main one is calvarise. That is something that, you know, weve been working with bsawsca and our stakeholders, and we want to built it in a way that it can withstand a seismic event as it was intended on. While been fine ago lot of trace faults which weve been addressing, so do you want to talk more about that. If i may, certainly on certainly on large programs, theres a concern of creeping delays. In this particular case,