and while you didn t know where that was, your sense of it, your belief was that he was close to home? yes, sir. so, after he reconnected that s where he said he was? yes, sir. and then did you continue to talk with him? yes, sir. and i know you think that s where he was, but what could you tell by his voice at that point? breathing hard. he was breathing hard. okay. are you sure he was breathing hard or that might have just been wind noise from the signal on the cell phone? no, it was him breathing hard. he sounded tired. designee sounded tired from running yes, sir. that was your impression? yes, sir. and that he breathed hard.
throw the first punch. this testimony that trayvon martin allegedly said get off get off is the most important thing we heard to date as to who started the fight. it s very important when we hear the fact, the jury will hear the earlier deposition, recorded deposition and then hear rachel speak to it, whether or not they believe that she is reciting on stand properly what they are hearing in the court. i think the way that they framed it, if they go back and listen and you see the question asked of her when they play that tape what you could hear. then she gives the information about get off. she keeps explaining back and forth to him, could have heard means she could hear and what she did hear and that s why they are fighting so much about this because the defense attorney really wants to undermine that testimony and really wants to try and show that either it wasn t true and she was coached, or she s misremembering or she s
pre-marked as in evidence, but we can offer it. we just want to play that part to see if it refreshes understand what you want to do. my question is it in evidence and you don t think it is. then i want need to be marked or identification, the state needs to say whether they object or not and then i ll make a ruling as to whether it gets admitted. so if you want to make a not have it marked, you may do so. your honor, what we okay. may we approach the bench and may we approach with the transcript so the court can read
hitting somebody, then you heard grass? repeat your question again. after you say that you heard something hitting somebody, then you heard grass? i didn t say that. didn t say someone was hitting somebody. i heard get off. that s what i said. i start hearing trayvon get off, sir. at the beginning of the recording we just played, mr. did he la rionda said, so the last thing you heard was some kind of noise like something hitting somebody, and you said yeah. do you agree? i said yes, sir. you just heard it, right?do ? i said yes, sir. you just heard it, right? did you hear that? no, sir. could we play that again? no, sir. go ahead, sir. can we play that part again?
wait until mr. west finishes his question before you give an answer and the reason i do that because the court reporter can only take down one person talking at a time. so listen to the question. so, according to this transcript it says, you could tell who was saying that? and your answer i could have heard trayvon. mr. de la rionda said, i m sorry. you said i could have heard trayvon trayvon. i would read the next half a page which gives a complete answer to this issue. what i would like to do now, judge is play the recording and threat jury decide what this witness said. is it in evidence? is it in evidence? i don t think it was