politics of this and are overestimating the amount of victory they are getting in terms of politics but the republicans might be underestimating the liability as well so i would love to get some answers to some of these questions, in particular the one thing that is interesting in the comparison of 9/11 i might work which is why wasn t the information shared with the people who needed to know in order to do something about it to prevent it in the first place? dagen: and the democrats, geraldo, didn t want to have a hearing about the emergence of covid which has killed 611,000 americans. geraldo: i treasure that the audience at fox news has tolerated me for 20 years knowing that i am out of step with the majority of the people watching right now. i hate when i agree with adam schiff it gives me the creeps. liz cheney and adam kings there are my favorite republicans. they are, this is kevin
speaker of the united states house of representatives. and i think she thought we were going to keep raising that question and that s why she sty in politico lapseuse, wednesday morning which means the speaker s office talked to the press the day before that said that the headline said democrats accept leader mccarthy s selection and then something changed. i think it s the fact that i raised that issue last tuesday. that fundamental question is the one that needs to be answered the fact that we are going to continue to raise that i think is the reason we are not on the committee. bret: how would you have asked that today? the focus today is why we didn t have more people there one of the officers i think i did see part of this where he said we weren t prepared for what was going to happen. why weren t you? why wasn t the information given to you? there have been news reports that said speaker pelosi vetoed, vetoed bringing the national guard here. and then the day of the attack th
that those board members including secretary clinton needed to have before approving this deal. leland: one of the questions you want to answer in this is wasn t the information provided and if the information was known to people who should have provided. it does bring an important question to the house oversight committee. among republicans coming from chat program is a well sourced and great producer on capitol hill for us says there s a lot of frustration on the committee. they don t have a lot of faith in the chairman. things are getting done. a lot of time folks cannot initiate statements the way you have and not much happens. what the promise on the follow through here? one, i ve spoken with chairman gowdy. he believes this is an important issue and is indicated to me is supportive of of what we re doing. you are right, last congress we have the oversight committee want to investigate the
guns to mexico. secondly, you have another, lead buyer who bought 313 guns, again, in a matter of months, he was on food stamps. again, the wire taps indicate where these guns are going, that they re getting the money basically out of drug trafficking, and they re going to mexico, and they re finding out a return amount of information that the guns are being recovered in mexico at crime scenes or being seized down in juarez, or naco or tijuana and telling us, so we know about the serial number, this gun was bought at this firearms dealer in phoenix, transport to do mexico, now showing up at a crime scene, yet you let these individuals continue to buy week after week, month after month, putting 15, $20,000 cash on a 50 caliber weapon, that they don t have an income to buy. wasn t the information released that the bush administration had done something similar like this? obviously the attorney general
guns to mexico. secondly, you have another, lead buyer who bought 313 guns, again, in a matter of months, he was on food stamps. again, the wire taps indicate where these guns are going, that they re getting the money basically out of drug trafficking, and they re going to mexico, and they re finding out a return amount of information that the guns are being recovered in mexico at crime scenes or being seized down in juarez, or naco or tijuana and telling us, so we know about the serial number, this gun was bought at this firearms dealer in phoenix, transport to do mexico, now showing up at a crime scene, yet you let these individuals continue to buy week after week, month after month, putting 15, $20,000 cash on a 50 caliber weapon, that they don t have an income to buy. wasn t the information released that the bush administration had done something similar like this? obviously the attorney general