djokovic could enter australia without a travel exemption provided they were fully vaccinated. mr djokovic, as we know, is not fully vaccinated, therefore he needed a travel exemption and as we know from the court documents he didn t have it. what this case highlights the complexity of the framework. he has got a tennis australia exemption which is not a federal exemption, but i can see why he thought he was allowed to enter. he was granted a visa and he has a document saying he has been assessed. but at the end of the day, is he a risk to the community? the community is probably more a risk to him being unvaccinated, but that wasn t the government s view, and that is why they decided to cancel his visa. so thatis they decided to cancel his visa. so that is a summary of what happened. what is fascinating because the way you lay it out there makes it sound actually quite straightforward. what everyone thinks of the rules, everyone thinks of the rules, everyone listening to that gets wha
signaling that s coming out of russia. the u.s. has its own messaging as it meets with its european allies. what we see come out of russia was interesting. you had the russian government sending a message to the u.s. by declaing navalny s network banned from the political process. your thoughts? reporter: yeah. it puts them up there with neonazi groups, terrorist groups like isis, banning them, wiping them off the face of russian politics. it s really tempting to lock at some like this and say, this is the russian government, vladimir putin sending a signal to the u.s. ahead of the meeting in geneva. it probably isn t quite that simple. at the end of the day, this wasn t the government. this was a court in russia. while they don t necessarily aren t as independent as in the states they are somewhat independent. this was a court decision. really, if they are signaling,
types of fireworks. the federal government says they are overloaded with pyrotechnics just too many. and finally 20 million. that s how many jobs could be replaced with robots by the year 2030. a global forecasting firm claims oregon is the most vulnerable state in the united states since its economy relies so heavily on manufacturing jobs. many of which would be taken over by some sort of a machine. all right. brian? brian: all right. meanwhile let s change gears and talk a little bit of politics. no robots last night. democratic hopeful tim ryan calling out his own party you know him from ohio, when it comes to working class americans. listen. we have a perception problem with the democratic party. we are not connecting to the working class people in the very states that i represent. we have got to change the center of gravity of the democratic party from being coastal and elitist and ivy league, which is the
right, some hospitals would have to shut their doors. lisa: that s where the breakdown in polling comes when people find out increase wait times. decrease quality of care. people stop liking the idea so much. can you imagine the government come along you have private health insurance 150 million people you are losing it. we are taking it off you. we are going to provide that. lisa: they are trying to make that happen. brian: president de blasio would make that happen. stop using that word. steve: meanwhile go down to the versailles restaurant in miami where todd piro is talking to some of the people. todd, we have been talking about our points of view what was said last night on the stage in miami. what do the voters have to say? todd: steve, you said it better than i could. you did a perfect set up let s begin with anna, a business owner. no party affiliation. she really is looking for the candidate she is going to vote for in 20206789 what did you think of the debates? no surpr
steve: speaking of the supreme court, they are waiting until last day for a bunch of decisions. oh boy. steve: including the big one including the census. i have been so wrong on this. i have been telling kilmeade each day the census opinion is coming today. guess what? it s coming today. brian: is it coming today? today is the last day. brian: significance is should we ask you citizenship question are you a citizen, should that be a box to check on the census? two significant aspects. county government ask? must you answer. i think the supreme court is going to deal with both of those around 10:00 this morning. i think it s going to be brian: why do we care? it s going to be very contentious. we care because if the question is on there and people answer it honestly and accurately it, will help government understand where people live and how to allocate resources. if the question is not on there, the government will not know where people live and how to allocate resources.