know about? we turned over every rock, and you start to think is there something we don t know about. did we miss something. it turns out it wasn t the defense that missed something. as prosecutors were examining boxes of physical evidence from the first trial, there was a bombshell waiting to hit the headlines. in december of 2009, just three months after cannon s new trial was ordered, the victim s families received phone calls from prosecutors, calls they will not forget. it hit you as a blow. it was, like, oh, nowhere do we go from here. it s almost like reliving the whole thing over again, when this was a conviction, okay, there s somewhat closure to the whole ordeal. now it s everything just like ripped right up again and we re starting all over again and it s, like, this painful process just started a week ago. it made me sick.
did you think they had something they you didn t know about. ? we turned over every rock but we start to think did we miss something? but it wasn t the defense that missed something. as prosecutors announced awere reviewing boxes of physical evidence left over from the first trial there was a bombshell waiting to hit the headlines. in december 2009 just three months african non s new trial was ordered the victims families received phone calls from prosecutors calls they will not forget. it hits you as a blow. it s like now where do we go from here? it s like reliving the whole thing all over again. it s like when there was a conviction, it s like, okay, there s some somewhat closure to the whole ordeal. now everything is just like ripped right up again and we re starting all over again and it s like this painful process just
been there would have been consequences but certainly not a death penalty case. judge jeanine: these kinds of things are reported apparently in 100% of the cases she has seen. anna, there is no evidence of that accidental drowning as per dr. g. can the defense prove it? and will they prove it and do they even have to prove it? i don t think they can prove it because i don t believe that it happened. but i think that obviously legally if it was up to the prosecution it was up to the prosecution to prove their case. the defense opened on it. this is their big wow moment we will tell you how she died. now, that is ho what the jury s waiting to hear. they are going to need to if have they have any chance but it will fall flat. is just outrageous. judge jeanine: it seems wouldn t you agree if she had come out earlier and said it was an accident maybe the baby s body wouldn t have been
caylee anthony died on june 16, 2008 when she drown in her family swimming pool. someone said that casey was dead and she drown in the pool. that is the newest story out there. surprise, surprise. judge jeanine: welcome back to this special two hour edition of justice , who killed caylee. the defense says it was just an accident. will they have to put casey on the stand to prove it? we are joined by mark fu by mas and mark firman. why would the defense wait three years to come out with a claim that this was an accident when as they said it when had they said it originally she wouldn t have been in jail for three years sphwhrvment you assume that she wouldn t have been in jail, that is nonsense. could town hall meetings have claimed it was to have claimed it was an accident or said anything prior to now in
will come clean to law enforcement, not her attorney. what is up with roy cronk possessing the body and moving it around? did they set up that defense today with dr. spitz? dr. spitz by all accounts, i wasn t in the courtroom but that never stops anybody from speculating. appears to have been as he normally is fairly credible. he left open a lot of things. even though it is a defense case, the defense doesn t have to prove a thing. if there is a reasonable doubt and if one juror finds there is a reasonable doubt then it is no conviction. so we can speculate all we want but i will tell you one thing me sitting 3,000 miles away and not in the courtroom knowing dr. spitz as i do, he seems to me to have gotten the better of the pathologists. do you have to put casey on the stand to establish it was an accidental drowning even though they came out and said