to disclose who assured him the special prosecutor is safe. i m glad other people have voices especially and including mitch mcconnell. it s so critical at this point that we have a chorus of republicans recommending that we stay the course and see if investigation through. there would be nothing more catastrophic in our history barring some relevant historical parallels like watergate that, you know, getting rid of mueller or somehow ending the investigation, would be the worst of all possible scenarios. it would lead the public certainly lead to impeachment. so maintain the course. and bob mueller in this investigation and let it play out. so, dan, do you think that they should be so assured that he is not going to try to fire mueller? because he could do it on a whim. no, no. the i mean the compensates- it s glad i thought it was good that mitch mcconnell validated the integrities of bob mueller areas investigation. i thought paul ryan s comment was utterly absurd.
his name is on that document. steve. if he wasn t involved in the original agreement then why did he want an arbitration decision? i mean, steve, come on. that s a lawsuit. do you really think do you really think be honest, do you really think didn t know that michael cohen was paying this money to him. i do not. you think he didn t know. you don t believe or you do believe. you can laugh at me. sell that man a bridge. i don t think he knew. because the american people had already made it clear that this was not relevant to the process of him becoming president. what does it have to do with michael cohen. but again to joan s question, if it wasn t relevant, then why do an nda and pay her $130,000? because apparently that s a question to ask owen. i don t speak for him. and he is not the president of the united states. donald trump is. that s the man who.
there was not a shred of evidence that the president knew about this. who is only person benefitting. why did he make himself a party to a lawsuit. he didn t he is a party to a lawsuit that he did not have to get involved he made himself a party to a lawsuit. he didn t have to get involved. exactly why did he make himself a party to the arbitration? his name is on that document. steve. if he wasn t involved in the original agreement then why did he want an arbitration decision? i mean, steve, come on. that s a lawsuit. do you really think do you really think be honest, do you really think didn t know that michael cohen was paying this money to him. i do not. you think he didn t know. you don t believe or you do believe. you can laugh at me. sell that man a bridge. i don t think he knew. because the american people had already made it clear that this was not relevant to the process of him becoming president. what does it have to do with michael cohe
device to initiate by lifting or opening a box. even the the uni bomber used a plunger type device when the box was lifted off the ground it set off the device. so right now i think what we have is a wealth of potential information. because one device that didn t initiate. depending how the bomb techs had to rsp the device render it safe, once they can do that they can do forensics on pennsylvania device that s intact. y he. looking at fingerprinting looking at dpa and also looking at components. now, i participated in the iraq in the later part of my career with what they call the combined stloef exploitation cell. we learned in war conditions how to collect this information and we were very successful in tracing bombs back to the origin based on the information collected at the scene.
there would be nothing more catastrophic in our history barring some relevant historical parallels like watergate that, you know, getting rid of mufl or somehow ending the investigation would be the worst of all possible scenarios. it would lead the public certainly lead to impeachment. so maintain the course. and bob mueller in this investigation and let it play out. so, dan, do you think that they should be so assured that he is not going to try to fire mueller? because he could do it on a whim. no, no. the i mean the compensates- it s glad i thought it was good that mitch mcconnell validated the integrities of bob mueller areas investigation. i thought paul ryan s comment was utter ily areceived assurances from trump s staff who we heard all weekend he is not listening to. and trump has a history did dsh he has no history of being honest or doing the right thing. these are not assurances you can