looked at the fda validated the test for was a prediction to whether or not you would be infactive or not. if you actually look at the actual approval of the tests and that wasn t one of the indications forra, proval. i would love to have you back soon to keep talking through this. i really appreciate your patience with us tonight. dr. anthony fauci, thank you very much. good to be with you. thank you, chris. we ll see you soon. we have received word tonight of the death of a true titan of the united states senate and the democratic party, the former majority leader harry reid, his former top adviser will join me next to discuss his legacy and it s a big one. don t go away. un. go for 10 runs! run a marathon. instead, start small. with nicorette. which can lead to something big. start stopping with nicorette. aleve-x. it s fast, powerful
it is later in the course? that is the cdc s basis for saying that you don t necessarily have to have a test at that point. okay. that the value of the prediction at that latter five days diminishes such that that s not really a highly predictive parameter. in fact, if you look at what the fda validated the test for was never as a prediction of whether or not after x number of days you re going to be infective or not. if you go back and look at what the actual approval of their tests were, that wasn t one of the indications for approval. all right, we i would love to have you back soon to keep talking through this. i really appreciate your patience with us tonight. dr. anthony fauci, thank you very much. good to be with you. thank you, chris. all right, we ll see you soon. we have received word tonight of the death of a true
tests available to the american people as a travesty. here we are a year later, and you see lines for testing stretching entire blocks. i saw it here in jersey on christmas eve, people waiting outside in the cold to get tested. many urgent care is our having to shut down because so many doctors are testing positive. hmmm tests are almost possible to get and that s a reality for weeks if not longer as omicron records are being set as far as positive cases are concerned. take away the rhetoric and the noise here. the president and his team had a year to be ready for this moment. the president said he didn t reject holiday surge in testing a couple months ago. why wasn t one in place, mr. president? pretty easy follow-up question. they have clearly failed here. it goes back to an overall theme. it s a flat-footed administration. they are flat-footed on inflation, which they say it isn t transitory. at least that s what they originally said. obviously it s here to stay for a while. they
practicing legislative malpractice. it s the stupidest thing she could possibly do, because there s at least five democratic senators who would have voted sandra: on that point, let me get this in here. byron york joined us at the top of the last hour. he put this tweet out. to your point about that, he said this seems to be a certain blindness about the 50 senators who, in addition to manchin, do not support the bill. at least 51 senators opposed bbb as it currently stands. is there a structural change cannot sherrilyn ifil suggested one man shouldn t be able to kill the bill. but it wasn t one, larry. it s actually 52. and mark warner, tester, those who voted against it when it came to a vote i would love to see a vote. sandra: you suggested them all along. i have. maybe mark kelly from arizona. he just doesn t say anything, we have no idea what he believes. sandra: so you think if manchin had not stood his ground, others would have stood
there s a couple of things here. we know that donald trump has a problem with the truth. this has been a established over and over again. mark meadows also has a problem with the truth. and that has been established over and over again. when you have a president who has this particular issue, having a chief of staff with this particular issue, is a problem as well. whatever the complaints were about president trump s previous chiefs of staff, this wasn t one of them in the same way. this was information about how sick the leader of the free world was. he was in very, very bad shape. i understand not wanting to create a panic. that is always something the white house officials have to deal with when they re dealing with an ill president. but in this case, there is such an indignance with which the white house insisted we were wrong, about the coronavirus test and how sick he was. meadows wraps the information in a bubble that if you read the book, and i don t know how many people will