or he claims he saw one. nobody ever found any shotgun. because there wasn t one there. but if, you know, a jury could say, well, gee, he thought he saw a gun and therefore he felt threatened and therefore we have to acquit him. apparently, several jurors did follow that logic, which isn t the way the law is supposed to work according to florida authors. but it s the way it s working. well, i think we heard that jury confusion in juror number eight tonight when she said if you don t understand how we came out this way, you need to educate yourself on the law. i think what she s talking there is you have to listen to what we listened to from that judge. before we go, i just want to play one thing ron davis said when we presented him the audiotape of michael dunn claiming to be the victim in this. let s look at this. michael dunn should understand that the victim was the one that had a bullet go
self-defense in florida. and eugene, it s in there whether they are pleading a stand your ground case or not. exactly. exactly. so this is a huge boon to the defense in these cases. because they don t have to rigorously prove that it s a stand your ground law. they get the benefits of a law anyhow, because it s in the jury instructions. and, you know, the last thing the jury hears before they go in the jury room is language straight from the stand your ground law. and florida s law is written so incredibly broadly that it basically gives you license to use deadly force if you have any belief that your threatened. you know, again, mr. dunn claimed that he thought he saw a shotgun. or he claims he saw one. nobody ever found any shotgun. because there wasn t one there. but if, you know, a jury could say, well, gee, he thought he saw a gun and therefore he felt