that was on the back of garcia s car. it s big as all get out. i mean, it s enormous. and nobody said anything about that? never one mention of it, which to me indicated that it wasn t my client s vehicle. that s the more likely answer. the 2013 brumback case was more complicated for the defense team, beginning with the fact that anthony garcia had been in omaha on the day of the murders. how do you explain your client being back in omaha and searching for the addresses of one person who was killed and one person whose house was nearly broken into? i don t know. do we that s a tough question. i mean, you re dealing with digital forensics. ultimately the defense argued that because an investigator downloaded garcia s iphone data onto his personal phone, the evidence was open to tampering. you ve got a cop who s downloading what seems to be the most critical piece of evidence onto his own iphone. so it might have been a cop who did that search and not your client?
whoever is managing her finances and showing the genesis of those trades and that it wasn t my client. but if you re looking at some of these dates, starting on february 19th, the first coronavirus case was discovered in late december or so in china. in january or february, people on the hill were already getting classified intelligence briefings with regard to a possible covid-19 outbreak. they were assembling a covid-19 task force. with advisers on board. if, in fact, that is the case and senator loeffler had information and received some of these briefings, could that not lend itself to a problematic situation for her? possibly. but the next step in the face of that powerful circumstantial evidence is to show that that information made its way to the
people in charge of making her trades for her. if the government can show that there s that second step from the tipper to the tippee essentially that they received that information and acted on it, then the case becomes stronger. but then you go back to the origins, which is information given to members of congress it may be material, but is it truly nonpublic, even in light of the stock act of 2012, it may still be public information. that s why i think you see the doj has shied away from actually prosecuting members of congress. but keep in mind, there are not only criminal penalties, by civil penalties. you can be sued by the s.e.c., as well. thank you. still ahead, what dr. anthony fauci is saying about a national stay at home order. plus, democratic leaders make changes to the upcoming convention amid coronavirus concerns.
months. i am assuring the american public they need the money now. what we re going to do is, again, if we have your information, you ll get it in within two weeks. social security, you ll get it very quickly after that. if we don t have your information, you ll have a simple web portal and if we don t have that, we ll send you checks in the mail. how many checks can you process? we can process a lot of checks, but we don t want to send checks. in this environment, we don t want people to get checks. we want to put money directly into their account. so i think the big question is when and if that web portal is ready to face the volume of people that will be registering their information. joining me now, peggy collins. let s talk, peggy, about those that are eligible and receiving these payments from the government and when they can expect to actually get them. up to a certain income level
and nobody said anything about that? never one mention of it, which to me indicated that it wasn t my client s vehicle. that s the more likely answer. reporter: the 2013 brumback case was more complicated for the defense team beginning with the fact that anthony garcia had been in omaha on the day of the murders. how do you explain your client being back in omaha and searching for the addresses of one person who was killed and one person whose house was nearly broken into? i don t know. do we that s a tough question. i mean, you re dealing with digital forensics. reporter: ultimately the defense argued that because an investigator downloaded garcia s iphone data on to his personal phone, the evidence was open to tampering. you ve got a cop who s downloading what seems to be the most critical piece of evidence onto his own iphone. so it might have been a cop