decision meanwhile the debate over masks in several states continues to play out in courtrooms across the country. lester. miguel almaguer starting us off, thank you this latest covid wave is putting enormous stress on frontline health workers jacob soboroff rode along today with one ems team in northern california that is facing constant calls, delays, and burnout. [ siren reporter: in california s capital, the first responders citizens turn to for help are now saying they need it too. we re with sacramento metro fire, and we re on our way to a call for a 34-year-old that s supposedly coughing up blood once these emts get there, they re able to treat this patient and there s no guarantee that patient is going to be able to get into a hospital we pulled up to find a patient having a medical episode that wasn t life-threatening. captain parker wilbourn is with sacramento metro fire. what would seem to be an
doesn t look like there is any dispute in this case it was intentional. it solicits the focus on whether or not mr. zimmerman acted with justification which we ve been focusing on which is self-defense. gregg: manslaughter is the easier standard, is it not, but self-defense is a complete defense. it negates and excuses both second degree murder and manslaughter? it does, but here is the big issue. self-defense has to be reasonable. he had to reasonably perceive that his life was in peril. a lot of it is going back and forth. so he bought the skittles and expert says the injuries to your back of the head and nose whether it was fractured or bloody nose wasn t life-threatening. how can you come forward and you the jurors should accept that you legally perceive that his life was in danger.