closing argument as well as her reb rebuttal. she went through the elements, ladies and gentlemen, let me tell you what citizen s arrest means, do you see a crime? to shan s point, they re not looking at things leading up to this which leads me to wonder did they conclude that citizen s arrest was applicable here and they re honing in on self-defense? if they got to that part, you ll ask questions, at the time there was a fatal shot, was there immediate fear of death or serious bodily injury? were the shots fired proportionate to any threat posed? did the defendant at that time act reasonably under those circumstances? last point, alex, to your level of complication, even if they make those conclusions, now they have to go back and say, wait a minute, he might have been in immediate fear at the time and might have acted proportionately. but wasn t he the aggressor? wasn t he engaged in other felonies so we shouldn t give himself defense?
is a couple of miles south of leeds. at three o clock in the morning he was in big trouble, wasn t he? i am confident he will be ok. whenjonny brownlee is alongside, it will be fine. to donate what you can go to the need rhinos website, type it into any internet search engine or on the mnd website. most of the money is going to mmd and a local hospital in leeds as well. hopefully we will be chatting to kevin later this morning. going to mnd. every now and again you need a break and a massage. important to rest but not for too long stop just in time. you canjust imagine the for too long stop just in time. you can just imagine the difference all the support makes. literally hundreds of people through the night. we expect the last mile, that to be quite a lot of support as he
reasonableness. was kyle rittenhouse in reasonable belief that his life was in immediate danger? if so, under wisconsin self-defense law he was entitled to use lethal force to shoot somebody. look, it s better for kyle rittenhouse s defense somebody else fired the first shot than he did. the argument you would see is he didn t know where that shot come from, he was reasonable in concluding that the person who was chasing him fired that shot. therefore, he was reasonable in turning around and returning fire. that could be a self-defense arguments that you hear, and an important thing to keep in mind, under wisconsin law self-defense is a difficult defense for prosecutors and it s easier for the defendant than in other states. in the majority of states if a defendant argues self-defense, all he has to do is show his actions were reasonable but in wisconsin, the prosecution has to show beyond a reasonable doubt it was unreasonable. so this is going to be a tough one for prosecutors. rea
rittenhouse s defense somebody else fired the first shot than he did. the argument you would see is he didn t know where that shot come from, he was reasonable in concluding that the person who was chasing him fired that shot. therefore, he was reasonable in urn thing around and returning fire. that could be a self-defense argument you hear and an important thing to keep in mind, under wisconsin law self-defense is a difficult defense for prosecutors and it s easier for the defendant than in other states. in the majority of states if a defendant argues self-defense, all he has to do is show his actions were reasonable but in wisconsin, the prosecution has to show beyond a reasonable doubt it was unreasonable. so this is going to be a tough one for prosecutors. real quick, he was wasn t he not old enough to legally own a gun or carry a gun? correct, yes, he was 17 years old. yeah. okay. all right. so there is a lot of video shown today was graphic. it was hard to watch. how does
well, with trump removed, and i m going to say this honestly, it is the one silver lining about it joe biden presidency, i can t believe i m going to say this, but i think god for a joe biden presidency, because for the first time, people that saw us as such adversaries are seeing is clearly for the first time, there realizing wow, they were just spouting this stuff ridiculously, they were actually talking with something very real that i now see, it is our children that are being impacted by this. tucker: it is such a smart point. i don t understand mcauliffe s reaction. i ve known terry mcauliffe are 25 years, he s very canny. he must know this, why wasn t he able to pull back? it s just the teachers unions have too much power? why would he continue to tell parents they have no right to influence their kids education? right, this was really silly at have to say, to be honest, it s always really bizarre when a white person steps to the plate and decides on if you don t agree with m