even when he wasn t feeling anger, he would make sure to give voice to the people who had the anger. the other thing is the crisis is just beginning. should he have gone down earlier, now is the real crisis. just as you said, he s got to take command of that. i think this speech could be as important as johnson s speech in selma was, to mobilize the country for a climate energy bill if he does it right, not just get the votes in congress, push at that congress from the outside in to say, you think this is ugly like the troopers were ugly when they were beating [ diane lane ] when you were 14 you knew exactly where to turn to help your skin get healthy and clear. fast forward a few years. .and now that your problem is wrinkles we still have the solution dermatologists recommend most. neutrogena anti wrinkle moisturizer with pure retinol sa. in just 1 month it s clinically proven to smooth even the deepest wrinkles. so all you neutrogena girls it s time to become neutrogena women.
sthou national guard, 20,000 people. yet, the impression hasn t gotten to the country about those people being there. reagan understood the importance of pictures. i think if reagan had been doing this, he would have made sure each timt the president went down there, we saw pictures of what these people were doing. we only know it as a list and we have to somehow counter the oil-gushing picture which is central in our mind. the other interesting thing is when you hear somebody saying he shouldn t be showing anger at bp, the other side is saying he s not showing enough anger. he s not t.r., theodore roosevelt would have been blustering. i can just imagine what he would be saying. people would have loved it. chuck and roger, the president is critical of the media and yet responsive to some of the demands of what s been brought up here. what s ironic, the comment to matt lauer, and yes, it was a response to the whole kick butt part of the question. when he used the harsher version
was responding to media criticism. listen to his whole answer. he said i don t sit around with academics. that was a direct response to criticism particularly in times and the post. media criticism gets under his skin and he lets it show more than any president we ve seen in a long time. and he believes that the anger that people are showing is a media-generated anger, and the media really cares about his displays and his optics and his stagecraft a lot more than ordinary people do. but what really drives him crazy is statements we just heard from carly fiorina, small government republicans now saying where is the government? bobby jindal screaming ain t microphone, where are the booms? where is the equipment? where are the ships? these are the same people hold on.
people. yet, the impression hasn t gotten to the country about those people being there. reagan understood the importance of pictures. i think if reagan had been doing this, he would have made sure each timt the president went down there, we saw pictures of what these people were doing. we only know it as a list and we have to somehow counter the oil-gushing picture which is central in our mind. the other interesting thing is when you hear somebody saying he shouldn t be showing anger at bp, the other side is saying he s not showing enough anger. he s not t.r., theodore roosevelt would have been blustering. i can just imagine what he would be saying. people would have loved it. chuck and roger, the president is critical of the media and yet responsive to some of the demands of what s been brought up here. what s ironic, the comment to matt lauer, and yes, it was a response to the whole kick butt part of the question. when he used the harsher version of the word, it was because he
of the word, it was because he was responding to media criticism. listen to his whole answer. he said i don t sit around with academics. that was a direct response to criticism particularly in times and the post. media criticism gets under his skin and he lets it show more than any president we ve seen in a long time. and he believes that the anger that people are showing is a media-generated anger, and the media really cares about his displays and his optics and his stagecraft a lot more than ordinary people do. but what really drives him crazy is statements we just heard from carly fiorina, small government republicans now saying where is the government? bobby jindal screaming ain t microphone, where are the booms? where is the equipment? where are the ships? these are the same people