grand jury was given the challenge law in this isca. i know the eric garner case and mike wall brown case are incredibly emotionally charged issues. the grand jury was given the law by the prosecuting attorney and the law that has to be applied to the facts in each of these specific instances led to a no true bill being returned by the grand jury. remember you had 23 members of the grand jury and only 12 of them have to agree to be able to have an indictment returned. all right. was the grand jury told, katie, of some lesser included from first degree murder? were they told of some sort of manslaughter, reckless disregard or anything else? do you know if they were instructed on that as that being the law as well? that s something we would all like to know, wouldn t we? yes, we sure would. district attorney in this case did not ask for the release of the transcripts in this case. so, at this time, his motion that he filed had the court release only the particular information t
notes and respect for entities who behead christians, who you cannot talk that way about the people who intend to kill us, could dieing to kill us. secretary of state statement versus secretary of defense or president. and she is considered hawkish for many in the democratic party. i m thinking to myself that was anything about hawkish. that s not just some little tilt to the left. no. no. so-called dubs. this is lateral disarmament. if we just disarmed and nice to people. it s obama all over again. if i m ever able to moderate and a debate and she is running i would ask her about this statement and ask her about boko haram and ask her about president of sudan bashir who is under indictment for genocide.
you know, we intend to get the senate back to the way it operated for a very long time before the last four years. what do you think people in my hometown in wisconsin, now that this sort of shift of power, now the republicans will take control of the senate? how is it going to be different to them? as they sort of watch from afar and watch what goes on in washington, how is it going to appear different to them. notice a difference. two issues this year. one, people were obviously angry at the president. we all got that the second thing was they really got the correct sense that the place wasn t functioning again. now, they may have been confused about who was the cause much the dysfunction because the democrats kept saying it was the house. but if you look at the facts, it was the senate. the house passed lots of legislation, much of it on a bipartisan basis. it was the senate that wasn t doing anything. now, what i hope that the american people will figure out is that we are func
about this. but he is making it very difficult to accomplish anything in this town. he is doing this because of the political reality that he sees and you cite the the washington post editorial. they also said that house republicans advocated. this was buried at the end. these are two of his pals. marco rubio most pressing politician on this. in 2013 when he said he was for comprehensive immigration reform he said if we don t act on comprehensive reform president obama is going to act on his own by the power of his pen. that is coming true today. let me read from the 2008 editorial from the washington post when they endorsed him. one of the reasons he endorsed him his nuance grasp of complex issues and evidence skills of conciliation and consensus building and then he sticks if a stick in their eye about that not exactly consensus building. using the argument because congress didn t do it i m going to do it. there is a reason congress didn t do it. many in the house didn t
grand jury was given the challenge law in this isca. i know the eric garner case and mike wall brown case are incredibly emotionally charged issues. the grand jury was given the law by the prosecuting attorney and the law that has to be applied to the facts in each of these specific instances led to a no true bill being returned by the grand jury. remember you had 23 members of the grand jury and only 12 of them have to agree to be able to have an indictment returned. all right. was the grand jury told, katie, of some lesser included from first degree murder? were they told of some sort of manslaughter, reckless disregard or anything else? do you know if they were instructed on that as that being the law as well? that s something we would all like to know, wouldn t we? yes, we sure would. district attorney in this case did not ask for the release of the transcripts in this case. so, at this time, his motion that he filed had the court release only the particular information t