the place when in fact their actual effort might have been quite small. i consider a $1 effort to influence our election unacceptable. it s hard for people to judge just how much of an intrusion this was. harris: well, quickly, you talk about the american public seeing, we will have to see this full report and bring you back. potentially a lot of information about what was found and what wasn t by the house intelligence committee. namely, no collusion between trump campaign and russia. we ll see. ambassador, thank you. thank you, harris. harris: facebook executive, you heard the ambassador talking about this, facebook executives on capitol hill facing lawmakers furious over the user data scandal rocking the social media jiempbt. facebook ceo mark zuckerberg broke his silence and apologized. vowed to do better saying he s ready to go to washington to testify. william lageness has more from los angeles. well, harris, we just got word that four more members of
along with that title comes the expectation of smaller government and not a $1.3 trillion bill. talk to me. that s right. i don t think anybody, democrat, republican, conservative, liberal went home and campaigned saying they wanted to vote for the greatest spending, largest spending increase in history. 13% above last year. and not only that, har rises, you know harris, we get the bill, 2,230 pages at 8:30 last night. there was a night in there, i was up past midnight in the rules committee with amendments. but you could have stayed up all night anyhow, and read the bill and you still wouldn t be done. look, it s not good when the other side does it and not good when this side does it. we want to though what we re voting on. i go back to nancy pelosi, we ll to have pass it to see what is in it. this doesn t bode well. right, you can t be critical of that then and come in here and say we have a new president and this is our guys, now it s
additional interviews and obtaining additional documents. that has never stopped. we re pleased that with its have decided to cooperate with our committee even if the majority will not be participating. rather sad chapter in our committee s long history. harris: adam schiff calling it a sad chapter and, no, this investigation will not end, he will go on. let s talk about it john bolton, former u.s. ambassador to the united nations and fox news contributor. great to see you. glad to be with you. harris: he wants things to go on. this report shows important things. americans shouldn t miss it, the russians definitely went after us. yeah. and, look, this is part of a long history of russian and before that soviet efforts to influence american public opinion. if you go back to the 1940s and 1950s, ronald reagan came to public attention in the policy and political sense because he was trying to help the screen actors gould fend off efforts of
we come in with the fox news alert, republicans have just released more information and recommendations from their russia report. while we are still awaiting a full report pending a review by the intelligence community we have key findings to show you now. first, evidence that russia launched cyber attacks and used social media to try to undermine the u.s. electoral process. none of the with its provided evidence of collusion between the trump campaign and russia. and the obama administration s post identify election response was insufficient. but the ranking democrat on the committee, adam schiff, says no. our work will go on nonetheless. we will be submitting minority views. we will also be conducting
partisan attacks like congressman schiff. harris: we may hear more of what you re talking about, letting the american public see more. you have a full report coming out, in house intelligence committee review, but there s been so much stuff that leaked out of that committee, particularly from potentially adam schiff s side of the political aisle, that the public is learning in a dirty way anyway. i want to get on to this with russia. you know, back in 2015, we knew that russia had conducted cyber attacks on the united states political institution. that we already knew. that we knew that they had gone in several places in europe, ambassador, the kremlin exploited free and independent media spaces, open democracies, to conduct active measures in europe. the obama era administration already knew this was going on. yeah. i think it s completely unacceptable for any foreign government to interfere in american elections. that s why we have prohibitions about campaign contributions.