and they d relied on those agencies expertise. something that was put to amy ludlow if, after everything that s happened, learning together would rule out working with categories of prisoner terrorist offenders. and her answer was no, because there s no research evidence to support that. yeah, and we heard a number of times there s no research evidence for this and no research evidence for that. i suggest that the main evidence we have now is that it wasn t a wise idea. the arrogance in thinking that academics necessarily can on their own deal with the types of prisoners that usman khan was, to the point where, you know, someone can manipulate that. amy ludlow and ruth armstrong received several awards for their work, which was also praised by the prison inspectorate. but the organisation is now suspended whilst cambridge university carries out a review. do you think ruth armstrong and amy ludlow can continue to lead this organisation?
people, are now under stay at home orders in sydney, brisbane, perth, darwin, townsville and the gold coast. the government has come under increasing pressure over its vaccine rolled out with only around 7% of the population now fully vaccinated. prime minister scott morrison has been laying out the country s path forward. ., ., ., ., forward. the idea of having a border restriction. forward. the idea of having a border restriction, and forward. the idea of having a border restriction, and you forward. the idea of having a border restriction, and you know forward. the idea of having a border restriction, and you know my - forward. the idea of having a border restriction, and you know my views | restriction, and you know my views on those, and the idea of having lockdowns, is based on the premise that community transmission would lead to serious illness, hospitalisation and vitality. so if you ve got the vaccination in place, what s the point? what s the point?! and that s the m
relied on those agencies expertise. something that was put to amy ludlow if, after everything that s happened, learning together would rule out working with categories of prisoner, terrorist offenders. and her answer was no, because there s no research evidence to support that. yeah, and we heard a number of times there s no research evidence for this and no research evidence for that. i suggest that the main evidence we have now is that it wasn t a wise idea. the arrogance in thinking that academics necessarily can, on their own, deal with the types of prisoners that usman khan was, to the point where, you know, someone can manipulate their organisation. amy ludlow and ruth armstrong received several awards for their work, which was also praised by the prisons inspectorate. but the organisation is now suspended whilst cambridge university carries out a review. do you think ruth armstrong and amy ludlow can continue to lead this organisation?
i think people saw the advantage of having him as somebody they had involved in their programme, showing some capability to deal with even the highest category of offender. theyjust lost sight of the danger to the public, their employees and anyone else associated with the programme. at the inquest into saskia s death, learning together said it was the responsibility of the prison and probation service to assess khan s risk, and they d relied on those agencies expertise. something that was put to amy ludlow if, after everything that s happened, learning together would rule out working with categories of prisoner, terrorist offenders. and her answer was no, because there s no research evidence to support that. yeah, and we heard a number of times there s no research evidence for this and no research evidence for that. i suggest that the main evidence we have now is that it wasn t a wise idea. the arrogance in thinking that academics necessarily can,