was also making comments about iran and its nuclear capability said it wasn t a threat to iran wasn t a threat to i m sorry wasn t a threat to the united states, wasn t a threat to israel either. over time he has moved his positions. a lot of people think he is a clone of his father but in fact he is beginning to stake out his own position of things. sometimes going against his father. it shows he is a little better politician than his dad, he is willing to figure out where the voters are and willing to move there to some degree. bob, let me bring you in the conversation. obviously a lot has been made about the outreach effort from senator paul. he went to howard university went to ferguson missouri. he took a stand when we saw the incredible images of a very armed ferguson police department at the time, even writing an op-ed here. where do you believe he can be effective, if at all, with reaching out to african americans, whether they re conservative libertarian or traditional dem
this is the same president who said let s allow nato to nuclear disarm western europe. why? because he said iran wasn t a threat. i can t follow this white house. so i would much rather have us out of that region and not participating in that region rather than do what they ve done up to this point which is ignore all the signs, ignore the advice from military leaders. this is not a president committed to just about anything, let alone getting involved in a crisis, a civil war in the middle east. which he seems very comfortable allowing them to. if he s not comfortable with it, he s certainly making it very easy for them to do. vice president biden was the if irs to president obama and john kerry, we re going to work with iraq. the one thing that is almost
and take between sources and reporters. and a lot of the description this was a threat i think when you see that e-mail as well as the e-mail that bob woodward replied it wasn t a threat. there s a perception of a thin skin and saying that they have to be willing to live in the world where they re challenged, referring to president obama s aides. but this friction with journalists, it does not seem to be that unusual with this white house. no? oh, it s a constant give and take. and not only with reporters covering the white house and presidential administration, but also, reporters covering congress, reporters covering campaigns. there s always a give and take. but i do think one thing worth noting is policy here. and one of the things that the white house took issue with with bob woodward and a lot of other reporters following this took issue with, woodward said there would be no revenues coming out of a deal with the sequester and the reporting and the language
issued an apology to the elderly florida couple whose address he retweeted as belonging to george zimmerman. last night he retweeted i deeply apologize for the mclane family for tweeting their address. leave them in peace. some fans may want to stash extra cash in san francisco. they have stopped offering a deal in that city. they ended a promotion because of the high cost of doing business. some say it s about the new minimum wage system of $10.24 that may contribute to the problem. finally two schools of southern virginia were on high alert after man with a fun was spotted nearby. we learned two wasn t a threat but a zil war reenactor. he was speaking to a history class that he brought a rifle as a problem. they continued with the normal scheduling when they discovered the man was doing a job. should religious group on campus open up the leadership
legal resources for survivors of sexual abuse and assault. now, the schools can decide not to teach the course at all. they re not forced to teach it. and parents can take their kids out of the class. still, the prosecutor says this course teaches kids how to have sex and will lead to sexual abuse of children and to teachers who teach it, they could wind up in jail. let s talk to the district attorney. his name is scott southworth. and coincidentally, he was actually a cnn hero in 2007 after he adopted a child from iraq. scott, you wrote this letter and sent it out to districts in your area. and a lot of your critics say essentially this is a threat to get them not to obey the law, not to decide to teach these sex education classes. why did you send the letter? well, first of all, it certainly wasn t a threat. i love the teachers in my district. my child goes to school in general county. what i really wanted to do was protect them and protect students.