the right-hand side the path of the officer approximately. so he s engaging right now. the shooter just went by. gary, are they saying whether the murder of his sister was intentional or do they know at this point? reporter: so here are some of the key things we ve learned, they do not know if he intentionally shot at his center and his friend killing her and wounding him. they don t know the answer to that. it certainly is a puzzle. another thing we ve learned, this was a deliberate and planned act. this wasn t a spur of the moment thing. he was in two bars in the street, he came with his sister and friend, but he then ditched them and walking across the street went into a parking lot, he then changed, the camera shows that he changed in the car into a hosweatshirt.
thing, this was a deliberate and planned act. this wasn t a spur of the moment thing. he was in two bars on the street. he came with his sister and his friend. he then ditched them and he walked across the street, went into a parking loflt. he was wearing casual clothes. he then changed. the camera shows he changed into a hoodie. he brought out the back pack which had the weapon with him. he passed a police car while he was walking down the street with the police man in it to get this stuff. and he came up the street and he started firing. so that s clear. one other thing we don t know at this point, and this is really important, anderson, we don t know what the motive was. we do know from the investigation that police have done that this man liked violence. that they say, quote, he was obsessed with violence, but they don t know why he came here and when he came here and what he did. they don t know why it was chosen to be here at this time. the dayton police have been very up front
some type of surveillance prior to the actual shooting itself and that this just wasn t a spur of the moment incident. this is something that had been planned. and as you know, this festival lasted three days. so, it could have been that the individual or individuals involved had a look at it the last two days, made a decision to do it, and then carried it out this afternoon/this evening. you re saying day one, day two, they could have been casing the joint. they could have been looking at the perimeter to find the weakest point. absolutely. absolutely. and it sounds like they did that. again, with the chief of police suggesting they walked down through the creek to get to the fence, you know, there s a couple of reasons. number one, that may have been the furthest spot away. they may have identified that as an area where there wasn t any active security, where people wouldn t necessarily see them cut through the the fence. but all of that, again, the pre-planning where someone had
long before his presidency, years before he even announced, donald trump cut his teeth as a public bully on twitter, largely by repeatedly harassing rosie. he honed his craft in seven years and 70 tweets later he s taken that brand of antagonism and misogyny worldwide. we called the woman he allegedly cheated on the first lady with horseface. and new reporting suggests that wasn t a spur of the moment decision. the daily beast reports, quote, privately the president not only thought that it was strategically stastrategica strategically smart to go after stormy daniels in such a visceral way. he workshopped the insult prior to tweeting it. well before he monged her physical appearance he trial ballooned the horseface dig among white house aides, close friends and acquaintances. one even recalled him saying in pa passing, that bleeping horseface. i read these things and i m
allegations are part of a partisan attack. do you believe that? this is not only a judge, he is not a robot, he is a person, and he has been called evil, despicable and a gang rapist. of course you re going to respond emotionally. we can argue whether it was a good strategy to look back angry. we would all be the same if we were accused of something we didn t do that s so serious and awful. it is not about the anger. i think there are people that understand the anger because he says he didn t do it. right. he is passionately defending himself. he wrote that. that wasn t a spur of the moment response to a question. he wrote it the night before. had time to think about it. the next day came in and went on this diatribe about democrats and the clintons and revenge for the 2016 election. this isn t someone that s just passionately defending himself, he is talking partisan politics. does he cast himself as a partisan on the court?