wasn t a sane. hate her for as much as you want for being a liar, a cheat, a thief, a [ bleep ] you called your client in court just because you treated people poorly in life done make you a murderer. a million dollars is a lot of money. a million dollars to her that s pittance. he was worth 55 million when he died. her long term plan is not to be with a loser. that s harsh. the truth. which is the question we put to the prosecutor. she was getting lots of money from him. probably stealing and cheated at the same time. why would she kill him? the problem is he lives she finds out she s cheating or stealing. she ends up on the street with
two things. one erik couldn t have done it. 18 minutes before the murder he was on a pay phone at this denny s which isn t even at new incorporate beach. true the phone bill which had been lost but the point was he couldn t make it to newport beach in time to commit the murder. and anyway, they said, nanette did it. that the evidence in this case and at this trial shows that nanette johnson is the person most likely to have committed this murder. erik naposki was merely the patsy. at nanette s trial thoern said she was innocent and it was erik who committed the murder. over the course of this trial, the evidence is going to show that he murdered mr. mclaughlin. authentic of jealously and greed. mutual finger pointing. he had to agree his client