cops concluded this wasn t a robbery, the credit card that anna used at taco bell wasn t in her purse. the record. point me to where you indicated that anna moses had a missing credit card? give me a page where that is mentioned. don t have it. a paragraph. don t have it. her credit card was missing from the purse. there is nobody who knew that in this entire investigative team until they were asked on the witness stand. it was shoddy police work, he told the jury, as was the theory that all the unexplained evidence was planted by bob to throw off the cops. what do you make of the extra bullet casings? they never sent any detectives across the street to see if any projectiles struck a
the verdict was a relief. all her friends were crying, we didn t know what to do to stop the crying. as for bob, he said he is going to continue to fight. i. appealing, obviously, the verdict is 100% wrong. bob chose not to testify at his trial. we took his opportunity to ask him some questions in jail that he did not face in court. how could your blood get in her car? because, i was over there working around the house. they are small stains that could have been there for a week, a month, six months. who would want to kill her? i don t know. i have no idea. it doesn t make sense to me at all. if you look at the actual evidence that is out there, first of all, they said that it wasn t a robbery. but, if you go through what happened in court, you will find out, that they completely missed
lot of clothes thrown on the floor. a decorative sword was missing and two jade statues. likely expensive. but wait a minute. maybe it wasn t a robbery. her purse was present on the kitchen table. there was jewelry. in the father s pants pocket which were in his bedroom, there was a large amount of cash. $9,000 in cash rolled up in his jeans pocket. and that was untouched? untouched. so was the crime scene staged to hide something more sinister than robbery? why did they find that odd and very obvious pattern of bloody shoe prints but only around the bodies? and the shoe prints would go back and forth to each victim but they just disappeared. you were thinking how did this person get out? still, easy enough to id the shoe prints. there was an obvious nike swoosh right there in the middle. little checking revealed it was
he was the victim of an inept investigation. police were sloppy, the defense suggested, and missed big clues. remember, cops concluded this wasn t a robbery. but the credit card anna used at taco bell wasn t in her purse. i m pulling out the wallet so the records clear. point me to where you indicated that anna moses had a missing credit card? you probably aren t going to find it. give me a a page where that s mentioned? don t have it. a paragraph. don t have it. her credit card was missing from the purse. and there s no one who knew that in this entire investigative team until they were asked on the witness stand. reporter: it was shoddy police work, he told the jury, as was the theory that all the unexplained evidence was planted by bob to throw off the cops. what do you make of the extra
wasn t a robbery, okay? but if you go through what happened in court, you will find out that they completely missed that, okay? i didn t do this. and the person that did is still out there. and the frisco police department have given people a false sense of security over this. reporter: the day after the verdict, jayshree went to anna s favorite restaurant. i went and sat there and had my breakfast right there, at the table where i met her last. so just feeling her presence and in a way, saying, okay. there is a closure now. i believe in, life after death and so i m hoping to see her sometime. reporter: donna remembers the little moments, like anna s russian accent and her trouble with the pesky nuances of american english. she used to say, then this afternoon, i go store. and i d say, but anna, go to the store. oh, it s not necessary. why to the? it s so silly. it s not necessary.