allegations. but this is at the core of the trump presidency. this view of race. this view of immigration. this is very much what s wanted from somebody from judge kavanaugh and it s really alarming. actually, it s what was at the heart of the trump campaign from early december when the president came out, then candidate trump came out, talking about a muslim ban and it wasn t a muslim ban based on six or seven countries that posed the greatest national security risk to americans, it was for 1.5 billion muslims. joe, look, the president gave a speech not long ago in which he tried to tell his voters what you can imagine if democrats succeeded in taking the house of representatives and/or the senate. and he envisioned a world of socialism run amuck. he said the country would be awash in immigrants. and he s painting a nightmarish
constitutional, it wasn t a muslim majority country, did that help at all? how will this go? it does help in the travel ban is constitutional, i believe firmly the supreme court will rule as such. the head of the department of homeland security, a multiagency comprehensive worldwide assessment doing background for this proclamation and the vast majority of countries will not make it into the proclamation and did not ultimately make it in, and failed to provide enough information to ascertain those citizens, and the president is circumscribed by the constitution and congress giving wide latitude in arenas of national security and public to assess citizens can enter the country. and bottom line the entries that
can it not be the national inquirer s version? there are truthful ways of doing it rather than a fake false way that has nothing to do with the truth. if he does it from the podium then you d be cool with it? excuse me. muslims and gays being thrown off buildings, then it s official to you? you re arguing something that doesn t make sense ben? hold on, angela. producers, hold on. if you cannot argue that something is real if you re tweeting something out that s fake. if you re putting out fake information, you can t argue that it s real. we screen what s fake. none of them are verified. the one of the two teenage boys, that say fake video. so you re saying that was a fake fight, never happened? it was staged? no, what he s saying is that it wasn t a muslim. go ahead, angela. they re not muslim people. it was a dutch kid attacking
terror incidents. greg: cnn devoted years on police brutality. enough hatred toward the cops of the cops couldn t do their job. meanwhile they are doing specials on climate change based on faulty climate models. juan: the exception would be it wasn t a muslim who did it. it doesn t get covered. what happened in south carolina. when black people get that s not mass murder. eric: recovered back. we covered that. covered the quebec killing. juan: that s how i know about it but i m telling you. somebody said to me today, you know what, on trump s list, no mention of terror attacks in
strategist, jessica. i want to tell you initially when the executive order came down and heard from appellate judge out of the massachusetts and now hearing a completely different ruling from a different appellate judge in washington state. if you re at home you re feeling confused. what s going to happen next? because now we have two competing views, but obviously the most recent ruling stands. i think obviously the unfortunate thing here is that the confusion is going to continue. there s going to be a lot of back and forth and i think really what we can blame is the rollout of the executive order. it took days for general kelly to get out there and talk about what the travel ban or it wasn t a muslim ban and it s not good enough for people, and some are saying in the court system that it s executive