she would have been a great president. i think it s time to bring in some new younger leaders, who? that s the issue. when you say who else is there, when we get down to the brass tacks of the way we run nomination fights in this country, if she wants it, that nomination, i think, could not be denied her. as of today, as of today, with regard to trump, you have to say the same thing. say what you will be him, say what you will about her? could anyone deny them if they decided this is what we want to do? my answer, no. up ahead, people find computer generated deepfake faces more trusting than the real thing. that is the finding of a study that surprised the scientist who did it. and a san francisco woman was charged with a crime based on a dna sample law enforcement got years earlier when she was sexually assaulted. the city s dna dropped the charges and he s here to explain. remember, i want to know what you think.
what else do we have? past crime, yes. future crime, absolutely no. well, how come? why does it matter whether you re talking about the past or in the future? i don t see that distinguishing. here s what i think. i think that maybe you treat a sexual assault different than any other crime. here s a question i continue to have about francis. do we have one database or two? there ought to be a dna database for the sexual assault related crime, then a separate one for everything else. if they don t have that, a big mistake. as i soldier, i have gave dna for one purpose f it should not be used for any other purpose. what a fascinating issue.
Transcripts for CNN Smerconish 20220219 14:53:45 archive.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from archive.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
the survey says well, interesting. it s a 60/40 essentially. i m surprised by that. now they tell me more have voted on that. i thought that the d.a. ch chch chesa boudin, i have to go back and read the transcript, i think he said likely yes, others have been prosecuted for this. dna should be taken from every baby born, crime would drop precipitously in one generation. eric, crime may drop in one generation, but what other sacrifice of your privacy would then follow from that? do the cost/benefit analysis. do you think crime dropping would be worth what you are giving up? i m not so sure.
sexual assault without their permission. and the reason why look, thankfully, this wasn t a more serious crime. but the reason we need clear laws. the reason we re working with state scott wiener and to make crystal clear that this practices are unacceptable and illegal and prohibited is because we cannot be in a situation, as you posit, where there s a murder case that is tainted by unlawful law enforcement searches. let s be really clear, the fourth amendment to the u.s. constitution, marcy s law, california s victims bill of rights don t distinguish between property crimes and murders. they provide guarantees that apply to all sections of crime. and they prohibit using dna beyond the scope of contenconte. and there s good reason for that legal prohibition. in this case quick final question.