Gotcha sorry. [laughter] i wanted to ask you about public confusion, connected with Attorney General barrs release of your report. I will be coding you are in march 27th letter. Sarah, in that letter and at several other times did you convey to the Attorney General that the introductions and executive some summaries accurately i have to say the letter itself speaks for itself. And those were your words and that . Continuing with your letter, you are to the Attorney General that the summary letter the department sent to congress and released to the public late in the afternoon of march 24th did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance of this offices work and conclusions. Is that correct . Again, i rely on the letter itself for its terms. Thank you. What was it about the reports context, nature, substance that the attorneys letter did not capture . I think we captured that in the in the March 27th Responsive letter. This is from the letter. Im directing you to the letter its
saying, trey gowdy, that obstruction is the more fertile ground with this investigation. however, with regard to collusion, the oversight of the equation is pretty rich. when you start to look at how all this got laid out, the collusion, the meetings that happened with professor mifsud. why wasn t he investigated? why didn t they look intimate? is he western intelligence or russian intelligence? why wasn t a globs-off relationship with mifsud? you think about a downer, putting out these little feelings for papadopoulos, for carter page along the way. i would imagine that the folks on your side of the aisle are going to have quite a few questions about that. and perhaps the nonanswers from mueller will speak volumes there. he s going to say that s not in his preview. kenny buck, former federal prosecutor, they had an extra question for the democratic mantra was the president is not above the law, no one is above the law.