Damage National Security if released. The departments Court Challenge again expected any moment would be an attempt to reverse cannons restrictions. But theres another aspect of all this to keep in mind. The appeal were talking about would be heard in the 11th u. S. Circuit court of appeals where six of 11 judges happen to be trump appointees. All of this remains up in the air. Another major advancement to tell you about in this story, judge cannon also appointed a Special Master to review those seized document. His name is Raymond Deariement a semi retired u. S. District judge from new york. He was originally suggested by trumps team. He ultimately was approved of by both parties. Dearies deadline is one week after thanksgiving, thats November 30th. Weeks, of course, after the midterm elections and more than a month after the date doj had requested. And when were talking about potential threats to National Security, we all know at this point time is of the essence. Just what makes it
damage national security if released. the department s court challenge again expected any moment would be an attempt to reverse cannon s restrictions. but there s another aspect of all this to keep in mind. the appeal we re talking about would be heard in the 11th u.s. circuit court of appeals where six of 11 judges happen to be trump appointees. all of this remains up in the air. another major advancement to tell you about in this story, judge cannon also appointed a special master to review those seized document. his name is raymond deariement a semi retired u.s. district judge from new york. he was originally suggested by trump s team. he ultimately was approved of by both parties. dearie s deadline is one week after thanksgiving, that s november 30th. weeks, of course, after the midterm elections and more than a month after the date doj had requested. and when we re talking about potential threats to national security, we all know at this point time is of the essence. jus
element it wasn t just obstructing an investigation. like sort of a that was, but it was obstructing an investigation to ensure that classified information that could damage national security was obtained and any damage rectified. that s the obstructive act. so it really elevates i think the concern and really the level of seriousness of the conduct we re talking about. when you look at the public-facing evidence of obstruction, do you see things that normal person wouldn t? i mean, do you see that there s somebody cooperating that had access to this mishandling of classified documents? do you see that there s a flow of information to doj? i wish i could say i knew what, you know, redacted paragraph 65 referred to. me, too. i think more to the point, i think what it shows that there are certainly key people who are, in fact, cooperating, key witnesses who are participating. and i think when you talk about sort of the end game, what this looks like, really the ultimate quest