what is the sun reporting tonight? they have been reading on this story for the last several days. on the front page tomorrow, it is reading on the story again. the headline says, bbc are liars. family of youngster paid by abc staffer sex pictures says a corporation ignored bombshell testimony given seven weeks ago. is the step that has said that he told bbc bosses they had screenshots of contact between their child and the start. i quote, he said, we put the allegations to them for an hour. this evening, i understand it is not clear whether those screenshots were shared with the bbc and whether the two parties did speak for that length of time. the article also says, this is very crucial, i told the bbc i had gone to the police in desperation, but they couldn t do anything as they said it wasn t illegal. that is
got prosecuted or central bankers. instead, the serious fraud office indicted peterjohnson for a much smaller so called interest rate manipulation that the us courts have now decided wasn t illegal and broke no rules. believing he d lose at trial, he pleaded guilty and in 2016 went to jail. were you ordered by your bosses to post false libor rates under pressure from the bank of england? yes or no? no comment. what were you thinking at that moment when i confronted you? i was thinking, damn right i was. you said no comment. i had been advised by my lawyers to just say nothing. but you would have liked to have said yes. oh, absolutely. the serious fraud office said nine traders knowingly rigged rates for their own benefit and juries in the court of appeal had agreed they committed a crime. whilst the real villains got off scot free, the scapegoats, including some whistle blowers, face coercion and injustice. in a newly published book,
but it wasn t board directors who got prosecuted or central bankers. instead, the serious fraud office indicted peterjohnson for a much smaller so called interest rate manipulation that the us courts have now decided wasn t illegal and broke no rules. believing he d lose at trial, he pleaded guilty and in 2016 went to jail. were you ordered by your bosses to post false libor rates under pressure from the bank of england? yes or no? no comment. what were you thinking at that moment when i confronted you? i was thinking, damn right i was. you said no comment. i had been advised by my lawyers to just say nothing. but you would have liked to have said yes. 0h, absolutely. the serious fraud office said nine traders knowingly rigged rates for their own benefit and juries in the court of appeal had agreed they committed a crime. whilst the real villains got off scot free, the scapegoats, including some whistle blowers,
i have to say all the libors are incorrect and they are too low. but on the 29th october 2008, his immediate boss, mark dearlove, reluctantly passed on an instruction from above to take part in the very fraud he d sought to expose. barclays board directors had come under pressure from the top of the financial system. the bottom line is you re going to absolutely hate this. we ve had some very serious pressure from the uk government and the bank of england about this. but it wasn t board directors who got prosecuted or central bankers. instead, the serious fraud office indicted peterjohnson for a much smaller so called interest rate manipulation that the us courts have now decided wasn t illegal and broke no rules.
smaller so called interest rate manipulation that the us courts have now decided wasn t illegal and broke now decided wasn t illegal and broke no rules. believing he would lose at trial, he pleaded guilty and in 2016 went to jail. when you ordered by your bosses to post false libel rates under pressure from the bank of england? h0 rates under pressure from the bank of england? rates under pressure from the bank of england? but - rates under pressure from the bank| of england? but when rates under pressure from the bank - of england? but when you of england? no comment. but when you thinkin: of of england? no comment. but when you thinking of that of england? no comment. but when you thinking of that moment? of england? no comment. but when you thinking of that moment? i of england? no comment. but when you thinking of that moment? i was - thinking of that moment? i was thinkin: , thinking of that moment? i was thinking, damn thinking of that moment? i was thinking, damn rig