votes. he lost at least 75,000 republican votes in arizona. and so to me there was no these were the female voters in the suburbs that were republicans. these were the independents in the suburbs that ordinarily would vote republican. so i didn t think there was a mystery as to why he lost. because it was in areas that he was underorm performing with. right. his attorney predicts it would take nine months to a year to try this case. do you think a good solid defense team could get it done before the 2024 election? i think it all depends on the judge. and i think my impression is this judge may want to move it along. and so they ll have to be ready to try the case when she is ready to try the case. but do you think the american people was it in the american people s best interest to have this adjudicated before the 2024 election happens, before they cast their ballots? well, the paramount question has to be fairness to the defendants, fairness of the process.
he was listening to john eastman? i don t think that dog is going to hunt, as you say. first as to people who had some knowledge of whether or not there was fraud, everyone was telling him that the election was not stolen by fraud. and then as to the issue of what he could do legally at that point, he went through all the lawyer he wouldn t listen to all the lawyers in the department in various departments or the white house that had those responsibilities or his campaign. he would search for a lawyer who would give him the advice he wanted. but i m not even sure you would characterize what eastman said as advice. it will be interesting to see, but i interpret some of what he was saying essentially was well, you know, it s unclear here, and you can make this argument. i m not saying the courts would accept it, and so forth. and you act on that at your own hazard. also, i don t think this defense of advice of council is going to go forward, because i think the
or suicidal thoughts. antidepressants can increase these in children and young adults. report fever, stiff muscles or confusion which may mean a life-threatening reaction, or uncontrollable muscle movements which may be permanent. high blood sugar, which can lead to coma or death, weight gain and high cholesterol may occur. movement dysfunction and restlessness are common side effects. sleepiness and stomach issues are also common. side effects may not appear for several weeks. ask about vraylar and learn how abbvie could help you save. after advil. feeling better? on top of the worlddddd!!! before advil. advil targets pain at the source of inflammation. when pain comes for you, come back fast with advil liqui-gels. when moderate to severe ulcerative colitis takes you off course. put it in check with rinvoq, a once-daily pill. when i wanted to see results fast, rinvoq delivered rapid symptom relief and helped leave bathroom urgency behind. check. when uc tried to slow me down. i got la
multibillionaire and he goes out and raises money from hardworking people, small donors, and tells them this is to defend america and, you know, to cake of the he didn t provide any significant support during the 22 elections. and a lot of this money seems to be going to his legal fees. you just mentioned earlier you don t believe in the weapons inspection of the justice department. that s something we often hear from members of congress who were loyal to him after he gets indicted in he s cases. does that undermine trust in the department that you used to lead? does what undermine it? when republicans come out and say this is a two-teared justice system. i do think there is a double standard. i think it s something from whom? i think that the department tends to go far more aggressively after republican or allegations of republican wrongdoing than democrat. and i ve seen it myself. i ve lived through it. i ve seen it.
counsel, leader rector of national intelligence. is it a credible defense to say he was just listening to john eastman? i don t think that dog is going to hunt, as you say. first, as the people who had some knowledge of whether or not there was fraud, everyone was telling him that the election was not stolen by fraud. as to the issue of what he could do legally, at that point, he went through all the lawyers, he wouldn t listen to all the lawyers in the department, in various departments of the white house, that had those responsibilities, or his campaign. he would search for a lawyer who would give him the advice he wanted. i m not sure you would characterize what eastman said as advice. i mean, it would be interesting to see, but i interpreted some of what he was saying as, well, you know, it is unclear here. you can make this argument. i m not saying the courts would accept it, and so forth. you act on that at your own hazard.