gangel and i were told that there was a second subpoena that was a grand jury subpoenaed that will serve to the national archive to produce additional documents, you remember, that the archives responded to a subpoena from the justice department. back in may. to provide all of the documents that they had provided to the january six committee. it appears that tomlin and the team that are looking at things beyond the riders. they re looking at the effort to achieve the transfer of power and the role of the former president from his allies. it looks like they have decided that there is additional material that the january six committee perhaps did not know about. and did not ask about. that they are interested in as part of their investigation. it tells us that there is more that they know about. kim, doesn t tell you anything that the doj is going back to the national archives for more documents about january 6th and does this mean trouble for the former president or who else
that the facts sworn by the officiate are reliable. i thought that was pretty important, no? yeah. i actually don t that jumped out of me when i read it as well. that was a direct response to the misinformation that is swirling out there. the speculation that somehow there wasn t a fourth amendment basis for the search, he was saying listen, i m on the job, i m a federal judge i am the watchdog on this and it. does it does satisfy the legal standards. he also made a point of talking about concerns regarding the threats of violence against fbi agents and those public servants that were involved in getting to the bottom of what s looks like some serious violations of law and probably criminal violations relating to taking a serious record out of the coffers of the united states government. what do you make of that, peter? i think it s gonna be