was instigated by a video. what do you make of that? is that a bad game of telephone? of the message not being communicated directly, too much bureaucracy, what? no i think the intelligence was relayed directly. the think about the cia it can be a very simple organization. you collect the intelligence in the field. it gets reported through the channel. there is not a lot of wash put into the mix until it hits washington. once that raw streets intelligence gets into the mix in washington that s when all the editing and all the various agendas take place and you don t know what comes out the other side. frankly what came out of the other side i think, i believe, was a choice made by the white house to ignore or, basically just set aside the intelligence pointing to a planned, coordinated terrorist attack because it did not fit their agenda, didn t fit their agenda they went out with immediately it was spontaneous generation resulting from outrage over a video. jenna: you know the reaso