soon as somebody files this kind of lawsuit and gets to the high court, is a case that would undo limits completely, undo any kind of cap for how much you can give to a campaign, give to a candidate. right now, you can do that anonymously, give that to a 501 group or something. there is interest out there in letting anyone like a shelton adelson or a warren koch give money. john roberts was citing his own precedent in arguing that it was time to revisit some of the ways we view speech as money. there is grist there for a decision that would totally wipe away the limits. this one doesn t really do that. peter, the new york times, picking up on what dave was talking about with regards to the citizens united states the new york times quoting, according to experts in election law, there is no reason to think that the march toward deregulating election spending will stop with this ruling.